Westcoastgirl
-
Posts
22 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Westcoastgirl
-
-
I really appreciate your feedback Brian. It's supposed to be sunny for the next few days, so I will reshoot with a higher shutter speed and straight on.
I did switch back to the shutter button as opposed to BBf and any shots I took, I found them better than using BBF. Going to embrace the shutter button:)
I really hope this lens will produce ok images in the future as one with IS in not in mine:) Nor is a medium format:) I assumed because this lens was an L lens that it would produce decent quality pictures, certainly not equal to the one with IS or the 2.8 but good quality. I also have not used it as much as I probably should and really found where it may shine in its capabilities.
i will post more examples in the coming days, but I guess my question now is can I get decent pictures with this lens or was it a waste of money?
-
-
-
-
Thanks Brian! Will do this tomorrow! I really appreciate your help!
-
Yes I am using single point AF and yes I am isung bbf...should I not be:)?
-
I am using "One Shot" focus mode and I am NOT using Live view....I am looking through the viewfinder and have 1 point selected...pointing it on the closest eye.
-
-
I focused on his eye and looking at the back of the camera, it showed his eye? Taken at F4, ISO 500, 1/500 SS
-
-
I am hoping someone can help me.. I got the Canon 70-200 f/4 non IS lens and have a Canon 70d. I haven't used this lens as much as I want as I cannot seem to get sharp (IMO) images and I don't know what I am doing wrong. I keep the shutter speed above 400 as I know it doesn't have IS. Should I always need to have a tripod to get a sharp image? I took the camera/lens into my local camera shop and they said the images were good but when I focus in on the eyes they are blurry. Anyone have this lens that can give me some tips on how to effectively use this lens! Thanks so much!
Canon 70D and 70-200 F/4 non IS
in Photo Gear & Equipment
Posted
Fabulous advice! Thank you:) I am laughing at your comment about not affording x but buying y because you can't wait and that is exactly what I did with this lens:) I am just at hobbyist and rationalized that the extra 500.00 wasn't worth it if I wasn't doing this to make money. It seemed silly. But so is a lens that isn't used. A huge waste of money. I have a few in my bag like that:) I do need to get out and use it all. The . Time. I have honestly barely used it as I took a few shots and didn't love what I saw so switched back over to my 50mm 1.4 - this lens I adore!
Again thank you for taking the time to explain all this to me. I appreciate your input and advice and will put this lens on for a month and see what I can do with it:)