Kim Howells

Hi Janice, apologies, it's coming shortly. I've just had a couple of weeks worth of emails all come through this morning, they were "stuck" but my domain host reset everything and they've come through. 😊 If you haven't seen anything in the next 10 mins please let me know. 😊

Hi Janice! Yes it sure is. 😊 https://www.kimhowellsphotography.co.nz/learn-to-shoot-in-manual-online/

Noise and underexposure are the major issues here. It looks to me too that there has been movement away from the focal plane, ie he's moved backwards or forwards from the point at which you focused. You may find there are other areas of the image that are more in focus as a result. You'll need to be careful with noise reduction for this to be usable, but it'll never be sharp.

That's correct, your first post wasn't as it's not square. The 700x700 is a good way for us to check that it's correctly cropped so it can be assessed at the right resolution.

Sorry I see the issue. It's now combined with my photography site: https://www.kimhowellsphotography.co.nz I have corrected the post above with the new web address, thank you.

Hi Lauren, yes it does. Sorry I didn't get notification of your post.

Hi! I think there could be a few factors here. ISO and rain like you said, but also underexposure (exacerbating the noise), movement blur (not the lack of a monopod, but from the kids). Can you please post a 100% crop of his face? Edited or unedited is fine. https://www.damiensymonds.net/2013/09/grabbing-700x700px-100-crop.html

Hi Anna, you should have received a welcome email and access yesterday, are you in? Welcome aboard!

It does look really "flashy", but I am not 100% sure. I keep changing my mind every time I look at it, but at first glance I would have said flash was used. Then I wonder if the light in front of the rear leg of the frog looks like it's more from above (the sun) than from a flash, so it could also be really harsh, bright midday/early afternoon sunlight. The settings may give us a few clues. She shot in a semi-auto mode (shutter priority), and her aperture is as small as it can go on that lens, which definitely indicates that the ambient light was very bright if she was forcing it to have that shutter speed. In this mode, she would have to choose to fire her flash and make it pop up (or not) - it wouldn't do so automatically.

I have learned you can't trust the exif, as it depends how the flash is talking to the camera. The images I have taken using a wireless trigger for the flash, say "did not fire, compulsory mode" when the flash fired. When the Speedlite was mounted to the camera hotshoe, and the flash didn't fire (almost certainly because it hadn't recycled and didn't have enough power to flash), the exif still said "fired, compulsory mode". So while the exit demonstrates the intent, it doesn't necessarily show what actually occurred!

Hi Damo. Generally, the flash settings are auto, on, or off. Compulsory means that there is a camera setting to say that the flash must fire. "Did not fire" on its own means that the flash wasn't set to compulsory, and did not fire. So it may have been on auto and wasn't required, or it may have been set to "off". "Did not fire, compulsory mode" usually means that the flash did not fire, when it was set to fire. This can happen for a few reasons. The camera may not have an onboard (pop-up) flash, and an external flash wasn't attached (physically or remotely), so the flash could not fire even though the camera setting was compulsory. This can also happen if the flash is set to fire, but when half depressing the shutter, the on-board flash popped up and was pushed down by the photographer. The other time it may not fire, is if the external flash had not recycled in time to fire, or misfired for some other reason. However, there seems to be something else at play. I just looked at a series of images. The first was taken with exif "fired, compulsory mode". Seven seconds later, the exif was "did not fire". Five seconds later, it was "did not fire, compulsory mode". There was no change in settings at that time in-camera with respect to the flash (Speedlite attached via hotshoe). I can't explain why only one of the "did not fire" had compulsory, as the flash should have been set to fire regardless of my settings and the light (it was not in an "auto" mode, it was manually set, and the mode wasn't changed between those photos). I will have a look through some more images and see what I can find. I do know at that point that the light had changed rapidly and I had potentially made some changes while shooting, but I wouldn't have thought I would have done that in the few seconds between these particular shots.

You have access now, and you should have got an email about an hour ago. 😊 I look forward to seeing you post some photos soon!

Hi @AmandaNicole, I'll need to give you access, which I'll do now. I'm on the opposite side of the world to you, so I have just woken up. 😊

You're in! 😊

Hi! Yes you certainly do. 😊