Stacey Sedgman Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Hi Damien, Is this feasible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 I think maybe you meant "plausible"? No, it's not plausible. May I see the two separate images? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stacey Sedgman Posted August 7, 2016 Author Share Posted August 7, 2016 yup plausible....baby brain. Here are the two images SOOR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Yeah, you have to keep the trees. Don't let them get "fuzzy". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Is this the method you're using? It's vital to respect the reality of the light - the sky wasn't blown out by accident. It really should be bright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stacey Sedgman Posted August 7, 2016 Author Share Posted August 7, 2016 I'll just leave it bright Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 I'm not saying that. I think you should swap the sky. But when you do so, don't make it too strong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stacey Sedgman Posted August 11, 2016 Author Share Posted August 11, 2016 Still too strong? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted August 11, 2016 Share Posted August 11, 2016 No, fabulous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now