Jump to content

Brian

Administrator
  • Posts

    3,775
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by Brian

  1. I'd also set the camera to sRGB. In addition to making the JPEG Preview's histogram more accurate, it's safer bet if you fat-finger something and shoot a session in JPEG instead of Raw. It has happened, multiple times. Often with a panic post from one of our members. So I'd set it to sRGB.

    Edit: Before I get some e-mail telling me that I'm wrong and giving out incorrect info, and I should tell them to use AdobeRGB because of the bigger color space, blah-blah-blah...

    SAVE IT.

    Yes, I know that if you shoot Raw, the color space setting on the camera does not matter.

    That said, I'm a big proponent of WYSIWYG. (What you see is what you get.) It doesn't make sense to set your camera to a larger color space, work in AdobeRGB in Photoshop, only to use a printing company that has its printers set to sRGB. Or sell digital files and they will only be viewed on a screen as a JPEG, which will be in the sRGB color space... 

    See where I'm going with this? If the final output is sRGB, then why not have the whole workflow set to sRGB? From Camera to Computer to Print Vendor - set everything to sRGB. Your Histogram will be more accurate on your camera, the JPEG Preview on the LCD will be closer to what you'll get during editing...since you will be editing in sRGB, and you won't have any surprises along the way.

    Damien wrote a quick analogy that makes sense, worth a quick read:

    Why sRGB Makes Sense

    Bottom Line: Set your camera to sRGB and be happy.

    • Like 1
  2. Make sure your "Finder Preferences" is closed. This way the changes and possible check-boxes that you might have selected...those changes are saved.

    Let's start with the basics. I'd get a new Card Reader and try that 1st. Macs just do not like it when you hook your camera up. It almost takes and Act of Congress to get it to show up.

  3. Well, Apple doesn't always put them in the most convenient spot. On the new models, the ones without the DVD SuperDrive, they are on the back of the unit towards the right. The older iMacs that had the DVD SuperDrives, the reader is on the right, just below the DVD Slot.

    Things that happened to lots of people with the older iMacs: If you weren't careful, you could drop your SD card down inside your Mac. All you had to do is insert it at the wrong angle. If this happened, a trip to the Genius Bar was in your future. With the newer iMac computers, I'm weary of moving the Mac slightly, reaching behind the thing and inserting it. Way too easy for something to crack and break off. Whether it's the SD card or the slot that's on the Motherboard.

    So while you don't necessarily NEED to purchase one if you have SD cards, I still recommend getting one for ease of use AND safety. I'd rather replace a $30 Reader than a $800 Motherboard.

    • Like 1
  4. One more than thing, and this is what you actually might be asking:

    With a RAID setup in a NAS device like this, if the NAS itself were to fail, then you would need to get a replacement NAS in order to access the hard drives. This is true for all NAS units, regardless of brand.

    These HDs can't simply be removed and hooked up to another computer. They don't work that way. If you want to have that option, then you are looking at purchasing two or three individual EHDs and not a NAS. 

  5. So that WD Duo comes with HDs that I don't like, and software that encrypts your data and can't be turned off....

    Hmm....are you nuts? I would avoid that one like the Plague!! It should be off the table at this point. I know it's less than $500. I get it. I'm broke myself. 

    When I recommend things in Ask Brian, I have your best interests in mind. I receive no compensation from B&H for recommending one brand over another. Often I will link to the more expensive option. Not because I have expensive tastes, well I do but that's not the point, the truth is I hate-hate-hate wasting money on this sh*t!! It doesn't do anyone any good by buying something that is "almost as good as" and then blowing up in 3 months. 

    So please save up your money. Resist the urge to have instant gratification. 

    Buy it Right...Buy it Once. 

  6. I didn't tell you to buy that WD Duo. ;) Save up and get the one that I linked to.

    But it Right...Buy it Once

    All RAIDs have their own way of doing things and encrypting data if that option is turned on or even available. So that's why I recommend using a RAID that is configured and controlled by Hardware, and not software. 

    Yes, if the data is encrypted and something happens to that code-book, you are SOL. 

  7. If it's just Photoshop, it doesn't matter. PS doesn't take advantage of an i7's architecture. In fact, there is only a 5-10% speed boost over a i5. So if you want more cores for multi-tasking and aren't into games, the 5820 might be a better overall fit in this case.

    This was a Good Question. You made me think on this one and now I'm wondering if I should be looking at the i7 5820 since I don't play games and multi-task a lot.

    • Like 1
  8. Quote

     

    One last thing... Other than file transfer speed, is there another significant reason I should spend $899 on the one you linked, versus $449 on this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1053138-REG/wd_wdblwe0120jch_nesn_12tb_my_book_duo.html

    I understand it's only the Red Level and not Black Caviar - just not sure if I could still get away with it, or its just too darn risky.  (Or maybe its because of the data encryption thing?)

     

    Personally, I DO NOT like Western Digital RED drives. Yes, they are supposed to be meant for server environments, but I have seen way too many problems being reported with them in the Geek Groups.

    Why did I recommend the QNAP device even though it had WD Red Drives? Because I hate Seagate Drives even more than WD Red Drives. It was the lesser of two evils in that case.

    • Like 1
  9. As for which one to buy....

    That WD is probably the easiest one to use for the "average" user. I'm sure there are setup wizards that will configure things for you. The downside is that this unit is a glorified external HD and your Mac will need to be powered on in order to access the data.

    The QNAP though...it allows more flexibility. If you wanted to create a home media server, the Ethernet Ports are a bonus as it will act as it's own device. Streaming in house isn't going to be anywhere near 100Mb / second, unless you are streaming 4K HD over your network. If you didn't want to use the Ethernet ports, it does have USB 3.0 ports to use, as well as a eSATA.

    It all boils down to budget.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...