Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know I'm setting myself up for a lambasting here ....

I know what you’re thinking …

“But I need to crop away some dead space!”  No.
“I have to crop to the Rule of Thirds!”  No.
“Shouldn’t I remove that …”  No.
“What about …”  No.
“But …”  NO.

but .... I can't help but ask

When you wrote that article did PS have the option to unclick "delete cropped pixels"?

And if it didn't, now that we have the option to non-destructively crop could it now be included as part of the editing workflow especially if we used the 11x15 ratios?

(puts on protective gear and sits back to wait)

 

Posted

I was thinking if I ever had a background that I had to clone a pattern out, it would help me better vizualize the balance of the flowers or whatever or for when adding a vignette so that it was balanced properly.

Posted

Geez you're scraping the bottom of the bullshit barrel here.

The next time you have a photo which you think would benefit from premature cropping, post it for me and we'll discuss why you're wrong.

Posted (edited)

lol ok

I was just wondering because if the case for not cropping was only because the pixels were lost, then if you don't actually delete the pixels doesn't that remove that problem.  But maybe not clicking 'delete pixels' does something else that I'm not aware of.

Edited by fotographer.nz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...