Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 I don't get it... it seems she is sharp but he may not be. He looks like shake but she is sharp.... I don't think its DOF?? Can I use this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 This is SOOC no adjustments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 You're too hasty to blame yourself and your camera. It's not shake, he just moved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 It seems everyone of this series though... he is soft, she is sharp. Can I use it still? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mary Burgy said: It seems everyone of this series though Really? May I see another example? 2 minutes ago, Mary Burgy said: Can I use it still? No. Well, only in desperation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 also at 3.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 This one is f4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Burgy Posted June 4, 2018 Author Share Posted June 4, 2018 (edited) Am I imagining that she is sharp and he isn't in all of these? There is no way he moved in every pic. I tried focus and recompose though and am wondering if somehow that contributed. I just don't know why one would be sharp and one not. Edited June 4, 2018 by Mary Burgy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 15 minutes ago, Mary Burgy said: also at 3.5 This one definitely is a DOF issue. The boy's right (our left) shoulder is in good focus, and it's on about the same plane as the girl's face. The boy's face, however, being a bit further forward, has missed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damien Symonds Posted June 4, 2018 Share Posted June 4, 2018 15 minutes ago, Mary Burgy said: This one is f4 The catchlight from your flash is a bit more elongated in his eyes than hers. He must have moved a bit in this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 On 6/4/2018 at 4:44 PM, Mary Burgy said: I tried focus and recompose though and am wondering if somehow that contributed. I just don't know why one would be sharp and one not. Focus and recomposing is tricky. You can't move that much, as we are only talking a few inches of you moving. If you really wanted them both sharp, I would have been around f/5.6. Maybe even as far as f/8...but I'm more at f/5.6 for these shots. You could have tried f/6.3 or f/7.1 too. Don't worry about the background being blurry and wanting to use f/4 or f/3.5. The reason is, and it looks like you used your 70-200, is to use compression to your advantage, meaning you want to take a few steps back and zoom in to suck in the background, which will help blur things and maintain enough DoF to get both relatively sharp. Also, what Shutter Speed were you at? What focus mode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now