Damien Symonds

No, sorry.

But as long as you did the entire edit non-destructively, with adjustment layers, you can simply drag and drop them to your other photos, by doing this.

No, just the cloning step.  Where you partially cloned out the cream dog in the foreground.

Should look akin to this: http://www.damiensymonds.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/blur6.jpg

May I see the version with your cloning?  The whole photo?

This is indeed a quandary.  Never be afraid to leave a bit of noise in an old photo, if it also means you can preserve detail.

Old photos are the opposite to digital photos in this regard.

I think maybe you mean moire?

Then press Ctrl Alt Shift E to create a new layer above.  On that layer, go to Filter>Noise>Reduce Noise.  Apply it to your taste.

Then start the patient cloning repairs.

If so, the next step is to add a Channel Mixer layer, click "Monochrome", and enter 100% for the red channel, 0% for the other two channels.

38 minutes ago, diamante67 said:

Cool! So, am I supposed to only use the red channel?

Do you agree that it looks the cleanest and nicest?

Oh, what about the other white door on the left, and the lamp on the right?  Can they stay?

Oh, great question.  No, this isn't a job for cloning.

Give me a few minutes to play around, I'll be back shortly.

The absolute easiest way would be to change the background entirely.  Are they married to that lattice thing?

10 minutes ago, diamante67 said:

here it is. It is interesting because to me they seem all kind of the same, detail-wise; I am glad you think it is promising

The method to my madness is about to become clear, I hope.

Zoom in to 100% view, then go to your Channels panel.  Click on the word "Red", then "Green", then "Blue".  Compare them  I think you'll agree that the red channel has the nicest quality detail.

9 minutes ago, diamante67 said:

in the future how do I manage posting pictures given the max total size? I assume that if I clear up my earlier attachments then the images get lost?

Sorry, I don't understand the question.  What makes you say you need to do this?

Gosh, I think you did well!!!  If you hadn't shown me the before, I would never have known you'd done anything.

No, once you've changed it once, it should stick.  But of course always remember to glance down there, just to be safe.

Hey, this looks promising!  May I also see the whole photo?

Oh gee Kathy, I'm really worried about this.  Are you sure it's not too fuzzy now?

Oh, ok!  In that case, can you do this for me?

Not in Bridge.  In ACR.  Just open one image in ACR, and look at the blue link at the bottom.  Change it there, then go ahead and edit your photo as normal.

http://www.damiensymonds.net/art_tscs000.html

Ok, great. If they're imposing such stringent requirements, they should be able to advise what CMYK profile to use.

Yeah, gosh, the pixels of the screen must be very small to fit 3200 of them across.

How does it look now that you've made it 1600?

Hi Lauren, please read this first, then we'll discuss further.

Are the blacks so black because you like it that way, or because they can't be recovered in raw?

For your blending to work best (yes, that was going to be my suggestion) you'll need little or no black clipping in raw.

It's a raw file, I assume?

I'm pretty sure my wife uses VLC for these.