Damien Symonds

Done.

Of course.

Yep.

You can't tell how to do the second gradient if you have already done precise masking on the first gradient. You need to have some space around your subject. Remember this step?

I think so, yes.

No, do your entire levels edits.

With Levels in the usual way. Make sure they all match BEFORE adding any gradient layers.

Yes I would.

Well, that doesn't seem relevant.

No, that's just a flaw of your screen. Those lines aren't in the file.

Beats me. I'm living safely in PC land.

Oh crap!!! And Brian says you can't go any higher?

That's fine, go the DNG route then.

https://www.damiensymonds.net/2010/06/faq-help-my-raw-files-wont-open.html

All of this is based on this method: https://www.damiensymonds.net/preventing-banding-in-backdrops/ This one is also very important: https://www.damiensymonds.net/2012/10/using-photoshops-gradient-layer.html

Download PSD First, I selected a few stripes with the marquee tool: Then added a gradient layer: Then modified the gradient layer to make the left-hand side as accurate as possible: Then loosely re-masked that layer all around them: Then added the second layer (clipped to the first one): Finally, masked the first layer for a smooth blend, and added the noise layer.

Well, I'll be very interested to hear your analysis.

Is that your observation too?

That function seems to assume that our screens are insanely bright, and it has to dim things to match prints. But of course we know better - our screens are already dim enough to match prints.

It's fair to say that at the time LR was first developed, there were VERY few screens showing greater than sRGB on the market.

I'm ashamed to say I can't remember what came first in this chicken-and-egg scenario; whether the fallacy of working in a wide gamut space was already circulating the community before LR and Adobe jumped on board, or whether they lead it.

This is not uncommon. Some people choose 350 for this very reason.

Never mind, I got it, thanks. Enjoy the bonus module!

Just post it here if you like!

Unless they can provide you with a bigger version of the photo, it won't look good I'm afraid.