Damien Symonds

First things first, remember that ever upgrade resets the colour space to Adobe RGB. Make sure you click on the link at the bottom to fix it to sRGB again. What looks different about the interface, compared to what you remember?

Could you post the photo files you're viewing?

How much bigger and bolder do I need to make it?

What? Just do them!

Alternatively, you could try a light blue Solid Color layer on either "Multiply" or "Linear Burn" mode.

I absolutely agree. I would be very wary of a combo device. In my experience, any technology that boasts "2 in 1" means you're only getting about half the quality of each thing.

In what program? It MUST be Photoshop or Bridge. Other programs are not colour-managed.

Well, how about a Hue/Saturation layer at 50% opacity, with "Colorize" checked, and about +220/+70/0?

New thread please.

So you can't grab the window by the corner and drag it bigger?

Whoa. Please don't compare the calibrated with uncalibrated. That doesn't matter a bit. Only compare the calibrated setting with your prints. That's all that matters. Yeah, you really have to fix that. May I see a screenshot of your whole screen?

Ok, in what way does it not look right? The better you describe it to me, the more I can help.

You're a cruel person, @GraceCJG. I'm dying of curiosity here! How did the calibration go?

A setting of 15 to get a reading of 91 sounds perfect! Very very common numbers.

Yes, although I hope we won't have to go too far down that path.

I'm really worried about you messing with the screen's contrast setting. That should remain at the factory default setting.

No, don't wait. Please calibrate now. If you wait until nightfall to calibrate, you won't be able to check the result until tomorrow.

Did that work, @sla453?

Hang on, what do you mean by this? Adjust it how?

That's fine for now. Go ahead with calibration.

Don't keep me in suspense, @Jamie Brown! How did the sample print turn out?

Any updates on this, @Iva?

Hmmm, I see. Smaller, but still big enough to be visible. I understand your concerns. I fear it's because it's simply too small. It's just so fiddly to work at the individual pixel level, you know? And none of the blur options work well at such a fine detail level. Do you have any where the logo is bigger in frame?

Wow, ok. And so that we can keep a level of realism in this conversation, how big is the logo going to be when the photo is eventually put on the website?