Jump to content

Brian

Administrator
  • Posts

    4,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

Everything posted by Brian

  1. So it boils down to price, really...and how much video are you going to do. You are either spending around $4000 or $6000+.
  2. You might also want to consider a "SuperFast" 27" iMac, which will run you $2999 to start out with. Then you'd upgrade the RAM to 32GB from Crucial.com. Man, RAM is CHEAP now, $62!! Then add a Thunderbolt Based EHD, configured in RAID0 (RAID Zero.) This EHD is meant to be your "working" / "cache" drive for rendering. It is NOT MEANT FOR STORAGE WHATSOEVER. For that, we will need another EHD.
  3. I did a quick configuration on a Mac Pro. Man, I could spend even more. Mac Pros are not cheap.
  4. Mac Pro would definitely help, but at a huge price-point. It doesn't surprise me one bit about your laptop taking 10-15 min to render a single video. As far as the current specifications you uploaded in your post, you kinda are at a bare minimum and when it comes to a laptop, you are maxed out. In reality, you are looking for a Fast i7 CPU chip 32GB RAM (or more) 4GB Video Card A Thunderbolt EHD drive configured in a RAID0 A fast internal HD. Dual IPS based Displays. (Either two 24" or two 27" displays.) Price point, we are looking at being around $5000, give or take. You should also ditch Photoshop for video editing (didn't even know that was possible) and use a proper 64-bit Video Editing Software package.
  5. I'd recommend Photo Mechanic. It's not free, it will run you about $150, but it seems to be the industry leader for what you are asking. There is also Browse 10 from ON1, Inc. Which will run you about $60. If you shoot Nikon, you could use Nikon's ViewNX2, which is free. Not sure about the Canon / Sony side of things.
  6. Bummer. I just bought this pack: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1003354-REG I'd also take a flashlight and look to see if there are any bent pins in either the reader or camera.
  7. I'm personally clinging onto Mavericks as long as I can. Honestly, unless you have a brand new iMac, you aren't missing that much. There are some programs that require Yosemite or later, but those are few and in between. Of course, no OS is immune from being outdated and replaced, but for now...stick with Mavericks. If by some miracle the PS black boxes issue is resolved, I will let everyone know and make a big stink about it.
  8. Nope. Problems still exist. If you are on Mavericks, stay there. If you have the urge to upgrade, don't. Unless you enjoy hating life.
  9. Give this page a read. I'm thinking "Solution B" is going to fix things. PS doesn't like your drivers and you'll need to check to see if there are any updated ones on Asus' website for your model.
  10. I'm going to be cheeky on this one. This is what I did: http://bfy.tw/5ck4
  11. The only pitfall is if there are any leftover bits or if you have a special photo that you know it's location in LR, but have no idea where it is on your HD. I'd open LR, give is a once over. If you see something important, right on the image and select "Show in Finder."
  12. Here is Adobe's instructions on how to remove LR on a Mac: https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/manually-remove-lightroom.html#main_Remove_Lightroom_on_Mac_OS
  13. It's a SWEET Display. I'm kinda sad that it has been discontinued.
  14. I'd remove that Win 7 emulator 1st, and make sure you backup your important data on another HD. The majority of issues with Windows 10 Upgrades have to do with video drivers. So I'd look to see if there are any new drivers for your video card, download them and have them ready to install if needed. (Put the driver on the EHD with your backed up files.)
  15. Refurbed monitors should be ok, provided they come with some sort of manufacturers' warranty. I don't like refurbished equipment that comes with a store's warranty, it's so easy to have a warranty claim denied. I mispoke earlier. Use the DVI port with the U2412m. New 2412 displays come with a (white) DVI-D cable.
  16. If I had to choose between a Canon 5D Mark II and a 6D, it's a 60/40 split towards the 6D. The 6D is newer tech, but is an entry level FF body. I don't like spending $1400 on an "Entry Level" ANYTHING. It's meant to be outgrown. That said, since you are more of a hobbyist, it might fit your needs. The benefit to FF is the amount of coverage that the sensor records. Since its physically larger, more "stuff" is photographed. It has a wider angle of view and has a more natural 35mm look to it. There isn't a AOV change, so a 50mm lens acts like a normal wall-around lens, instead of a portrait lens. For that look on a FF body, you'll need a 85mm lens. In addition noise is easier to deal with, but crop bodies have come along way in that dept. I also personally feel that FF sensors produce a "cleaner" look to my eyes. Photos are more natural looking and less digital. But this is my own opinion.
  17. The 70D isn't well regarded. You are better off with a 7D Your problem is like shopping for a tripod. There are three choices, Lightweight, Cheap, or Sturdy. Pick Two. Likewise, you want a lens that's portable, lightweight and has a fixed aperture. Pick Two. i understand wanting fixed aperture. All of my current zoom lenses that I used are f/2.8 and there is a difference. Another lens came to mind. How about picking up a used Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8? That is the "24-70" for crop bodies. The only downside is that it's a lens that is meant for crop bodies ONLY. On the upside, it's similar to the Canon 16-35 f/4's focal range and has f/2.8 at your disposal. KEH has a "Like New" 17-55 for $619: https://www.keh.com/shop/canon-ef-s-17-55-f-2-8-is-usm-standard-zoom-lens.html
  18. If you are going to stay with a crop body, I'd get this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/351542-USA That said, this lens is more of an investment: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1051475-USA The problem with crop bodies and is you lose the "wide," due to the angle of view change. Your 24-70 acts like a 38mm - 112mm lens would on a FF body. Believe it or not, 24mm is "wide," you just need a FF body to take advantage of it. 16mm acts more like 25.6mm on a crop body, after the Angle of View Change So two choices: Lens or FF Body. I personally recommend a 5D Mark III if you were to upgrade. Since size might be an issue, and you might stick with a crop body, the 10-22 is in your future. If you do upgrade to FF, you already have a "Wide" lens, the 24-70.
  19. I'd get the Dell U2412m Display and purchase a DisplayPort cable. The U2412m has a DisplayPort option on it.
  20. I think the 2415 is just the current incarnation of the 2412. I've seen the U2412m in person at a photographer friend's house. It's AWESOME.
  21. The U2412m display is an excellent choice, but has been discontinued by Dell. (It's a few years old.) So if you find one at a good price, I'd buy it. The other UltraSharps are also good. Just make sure the display is IPS Based and either is a Matte Screen or at the very least, a Matte Coating. You really want to avoid glossy screens. I wouldn't worry about the CIE 1976 color gamut. Or anything else other than sRGB. People obsess over the "Wide Gamuts" because they think it's better. In a sense, it is...but not in a real-world sense. Photographers who spend extra on a wide-gamut monitor and obsess over colors, only to hand over a disc / Thumbdrive of images, that will be displayed on the client's crappy screen...are kidding themselves. Same thing goes for those photographers who think AdobeRGB is the only way to go, but when they print their photographs, the labs that they use print using only sRGB colors, so prinrs don't always match the screen. Before you buy a monitor, what kinda of ports are on your video card? Also, a 16:9 is the same shape (aspect ratio) as a normal flat screen TV. (Oh, before anyone asks, NO...it is not a good idea to use your flatscreen as a monitor to edit on! Anyway, the 16:10 are a little bigger on the top and bottom. There is just more surface area. Honestly, 16:9 is fine. So is 16:10, but since you play games, I'd lean towards the 16:9 displays.
  22. From the "What Specs to Look For" thread: What you are looking for is: i5 or i7 CPU 8GB RAM at a Minimum / 16GB RAM or more Preferred 1TB HD at a Minimum / 2TB or larger Preferred Dedicated Video Card with its own Video Memory. 2GB or 4GB of Video Memory is fine. Windows 7 64-bit Pro Edition OR Windows 10
  23. That looks good. I'd buy it.
  24. Just look at the technical specs of the Dell XPS 8900 and find a similar system.
  25. Oh, I will need another photo of the right rear side (I wanna see the switches.)
×
×
  • Create New...