Damien Symonds

Well, first, can you tell me what you decided about the carpet? Will you keep it, or can it go?

That sounds like the right place for the ICC profile, yes. After you've put it in there, go to Edit>Color Settings, and load the color settings file they sent you. Then show me a screenshot of the Color Settings window once those settings are loaded.

You're right. In Color Settings, you should be able to import the color settings file they've sent you. However, it's most probably necessary to make sure you've put the ICC file in the correct folder first. Did they give you any guidance about that? I'm afraid I don't know where profiles go on a Mac, though I vaguely recall it might be Library>ColorSync, or something like that? And why are you putting up with this? Why not switch to the workflow which was actually designed for this? https://www.damiensymonds.net/examining-the-complexities-of-an-acr-workflow.html

Just "glasses"

It can be, though. I reckon that's your solution. Just replace the entire sky.

Of course.

A simple search would have found this https://www.damiensymonds.net/2015/10/correcting-eyes-distorted-by-glasses.html

Oh, I see. Millers just add that text to the bottom of your prints, is that it? Is there a range of photo types? They're not all dark-background studio photos like this, are they?

Are any of them your own photos?

Easily passable.

A few questions ... How many prints do you have? Which program are you viewing the files in? Are you sure your room light is bright enough? Information here.

May I see the whole photo, for context?

This is excellent news. You'll never regret it. For now, leave the LR images where they are. While you're getting used to Bridge, just use it for new sessions you shoot. https://www.damiensymonds.net/bridge-30-day-challenge

PLEASE take the Raw Class again. You've clearly forgotten everything

This is very hasty, but I wanted to show you how to do it: Download PSD

First of all, I want to say that your job doesn't look at all Photoshopped. Yes, it's not perfect, but will anyone notice? Not a bit. Secondly, I want to say that you were looking at exactly the right method. But because it's the opposite (black background not white) you have to make the background around the hair perfectly black, then use "Screen" blend mode (as opposed to "Multiply" in the white method).

And you're worried about how you lost some wisps of hair, is that correct?

And what will the new background look like?

All of which is very wise. What WASN'T wise was the sharpening. Never sharpen during scanning.

The issue is that MUCH too much sharpening was applied in the scan. Well, it doesn't need a fix, because there isn't a problem. As you said, there's no moire at 100%. So you need to tell the filmmakers to be more careful when resizing. https://www.damiensymonds.net/2015/02/moire.html

Ah, crap. So the negative is long gone?

Well, you need to find out if they're viewing at 100%. Did you scan it yourself, or get somebody to do it?

Well, I'd like to help, if you'd still like to do it.

https://www.damiensymonds.net/what2buy_cal.html It's true that laptop screens aren't ideal, but a calibrated laptop screen beats an uncalibrated desktop screen every time.