Damien Symonds

What??? I already gave you all the info you need. Just follow that link to its very conclusion.

I think the brush that you used for the white ridges was too big? Also, you'll need to blur the text a bit, won't you. Its edges are too sharp to be plausible.

Oh, if that really is the case, then you simply need this. Yes, it's an X-Rite program, but works fine with Spyder profiles too.

I see pink tinge too. Any chance of tweaking it a little more? May I see the 17 up close?

Without comparison?? Memory??? What are you talking about? Aren't you comparing the prints??????? No. I'm worried about that. It really shouldn't have been necessary.

@Lulabelle5, are you still there?

It's better than with the VGA, though?

To clarify - have you calibrated with the DVI yet, or not?

Oh crap. That is NOT your greatest problem right now. https://www.damiensymonds.net/art_tscs000.html

@daisydoo, may I have this one? https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

Hey @oodles, may I have this one? https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

Hi Lulabelle, thanks for posting. It could be a number of things, I guess. First, can I ask, did you shoot this photo in raw format?

No, I just overlaid them in your screenshot file, and they look the same.

Please read the posting guidelines. They're very important.

For the 7, I think fairly close to the real colour, on Multiply mode. BUT - you'll need to lightly mask down the ridges of the roof iron, to keep the correct white look.

I just sent you an email, by the way.

For the 1, I think very pale green on Linear Light mode.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

I could use this. https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

I could use this, Julie. https://www.facebook.com/groups/195567190503489/permalink/1436906819702847/

She is pulling your leg at 12 megapixels. I'd say 4. I would demand a refund.

The problem is likely the action, or the images, not Image Processor. First question - have you modified the action in any way, that you know of? Second question - have you tried running a batch of older images that you know have worked ok in the past?

Oh gee. That's been artificially enlarged a long way, hasn't it? That's really awful. If you're going to print it, I suggest canvas. Canvas is more forgiving. But even then, I wouldn't go very large.