Damien Symonds

Firstly, you should know that resizing is the most important part of printing. If your lab needs 300ppi, you provide 300ppi. End of story. Secondly, you're NOT increasing it!!!!!!!! The resolution of the photo (at its full size) is WAAAAAAAAY higher than 300ppi when the size is 17mm wide. Try it and see! In the Image Size dialog, temporarily turn off the "Resample image" checkbox, then change the width to 17mm. You'll see the resolution shoot up to the thousands, probably.

WHAT????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Come on, you're in the Print Sharpening Class. I can't believe you'd even ask that question.

72ppi? Are you nuts?

No, the colour of the blanket is wildly varied, immediately below the child.

How did you go?

No, because you can't make actions in Elements, you have to make them in Photoshop. But Elements has fewer functions than Photoshop, so you have to be careful to only use functions that Elements has.

Elements is the far more complicating factor. It's pretty rare for actions not to work on older versions of Photoshop ... but it's very common for actions not to work in Elements. So you'll definitely need at least one version of that, if you intend to do this seriously.

Oh, hooray!!! How is your raw processing going?

Then I don't know, sorry. The only issue I know of is that Firefox doesn't play nicely with secondary screens. Have you tried resetting Firefox?

You don't have another screen plugged into it? You're just using the computer's own screen?

You have an iMac, is that correct?

So Safari matches Photoshop, but Firefox doesn't?

That's weird. You've checked to make sure your monitor calibration is still ok?

Gosh, that's a great question! I assume that people who do it professionally DO own a lot of versions. You wouldn't need every version, but you'd certainly want one older one. Eg if you had CS2, and you knew it worked on that, then you could safely say it worked on every version between CS2 and the current version.

That's not a limitation that I'm aware of? The Spyder Express can't calibrate multiple monitors, but the Pro can.

Honestly, calibrate both and see which behaves better. It's likely that one will give you a closer print match than the other. Do you have both of the plugged in to your computer? Once you know which one calibrates better, that can be your editing screen, and the other one can be for your folder and panels and stuff.

Oh, phew, I'm glad you like it. Download the PSD file First, a Levels layer to deal with the mildest of it. Then, I copied a chunk of the background from nearby, and masked it in.

How did you go?

So sorry about the delay. We took the kids to the movies. Because so much detail is lost along the edge of the face, and particularly the edge of the eyebrow, it will be impossible to plausibly get rid of the glare altogether. I think that our goal must be simply to reduce it. How does this look?

Hi Jody, thanks. May I also have a 100% crop of the problem area? However, glasses glare is not your biggest problem presently. You have a MUCH bigger problem than that. Fix it by going here: https://www.damiensymonds.net/art_tscs000.html Follow the troubleshooter all the way to its conclusion.

Excellent! Good kid.

Download the PSD I used the red channel as the starting point, because it had the best contrast.

How's this?

I downloaded it, of course. I think I've got a plan. Could you post the 100% crop of the photo with the grey background; and a 100% crop of the background filling the frame, no mask. So I can layer them for myself.

Make sure you always embed the image profile, whenever saving an image for upload.