Jump to content

Damien Symonds

Administrator
  • Posts

    209,690
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3,371

Everything posted by Damien Symonds

  1. We'll come back to those. Has sRGB fixed the problem in other cases?
  2. For the old files, yes. What about the new ones?
  3. HOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! In that case, then you'll probably find the new problem is here.
  4. The same as the old print of the same photo, do you mean?
  5. Good guess
  6. It's called "Chromatic aberration", and you can fix it like this: https://www.damiensymonds.net/2014/12/fixing-chromatic-aberration.html It happens, sometimes, on edges of high contrast, and I believe some lenses are more prone to it than others. Some really good info about CA from Brian in this post.
  7. No really, I need the EXACT SAME FILE printed again.
  8. Oh, hooray!!!! You're welcome.
  9. Darn, I was afraid of that. May I see it?
  10. That would be great, thanks. I think you just answered my next question, too - you've gone from one iMac to another one, is that right?
  11. Is it too late to ask you to take a photo of the two prints side by side (old and new from that file) to show me?
  12. That's critical to our troubleshooting. New files don't count right now, only old ones do. Go ahead and print one now.
  13. But you're saying that if you re-print one of those old photos now, with exactly the same settings (as far as you know) that you used with the old computer, the print outcome is different?
  14. Ok. And does the new screen match the old prints?
  15. Now, can you post the actual raw edit in the Raw Class for me?
  16. In the Lens Corrections tab in raw, there's a Lens Vignetting slider. That's the one to try. It doesn't work perfectly every time, but it's worth a shot.
  17. Have you tried uploading it to Facebook, to check?
  18. I have to head out and do the grocery shopping now. Funny how the family insist on being fed. I'll check in when I get back.
  19. Because if the bigger FB size (2048) works ok, that would solve that problem immediately, yes?
  20. We already know that 1500 (the size of images on this forum) works ok, because the very first version you posted looked fine.
  21. Out of interest, can you also try the 2048 size, and see if it's any better? Don't post it for me, just let me know.
  22. This might interest you too: https://www.damiensymonds.net/client-photoshop That's still 900.
  23. By the way, regarding the action, have you seen this super-duper one? https://www.damiensymonds.net/act_web.html
×
×
  • Create New...