Brian

Is this Windows 11 by any chance? Or are you on Windows 10? Head to Dell's Support Website. Identify your product by putting in the Serial Number or Service Tag ID. See if there are any updates, particularly ones for a BIOS update. It may actually request to do a scan, and I would let it. (Might download a Scanner Tool and ask for you to run it.) Oh, be sure to disable WebRoot for this. Sometimes it gets a little hyper and shoots down this type of software before it installs. The other easy thing for you to try is getting a USB Keyboard that physically attaches to your computer and see if the problems go away. If it does, it's probably and out of date driver. Oh, the USB ports you should be using are just below the Ethernet Port. Those are typically USB 2.0 ports and are more than enough for a Keyboard / Mouse Dongle. Or is this Keyboard Bluetooth? Either way, I'd check for Hardware Updates (especially BIOS) for your computer before going crazy.

If you can find a 27” iMac that meets my specs to run PS go for it. The problem is, this is a Mac Pro and is way overkill for Photoshop work. If you were editing Video, I’d say this is a good deal. The problem is the lack of choices. For something new, you are looking at a Mac Studio with the new 27” Display. That’s a $5200-ish purchase here in the States, I’d hate to see the price tag in OZ. I have heard of reports that PS actually runs slower on a Mac Pro such as this one, or it’s just more likely that PS will not take advantage of the speed with this computer. Like buying a Million Dollar Sports car and only driving 5 Kilometers to the store and back twice a week. KWIM? If it were me and my money, if I was just running PS CC, I’d pass. Even though it’s a great computer. All of that Xeon stuff PS ignores.

Thank You!

Oh, External G-Drives come with all the cables, not Samsung (and 99% of the other Manufacturers don't either.) It's one of those things that are so overlooked because chances are if you are a Tech, you already have a few in a box of cables that you have accumulated over the years. So I didn't think about it. My bad. If you don't want a 3-pack, I found this single SATA Cable: BENFEI SATA Cable III, SATA Cable III 6Gbps Straight HDD SDD Data Cable with Locking Latch 18 Inch Compatible for SATA That one is a straight cable, without the 90º bend, so it might be easier for you to dork around with for your first time. That one has 32,390 Ratings and it's also 5 Stars. Just be sure you click on the right boxes to select the cable that you want. SATA Cables are so common, that this shouldn't be a problem in obtaining one.

Yeah, you just need a simple SATA Cable. Here is one: Cable Matters 3-Pack 90 Degree Right Angle SATA Cable 18 Inches There is a 24" version if you need more length, but I'm pretty sure 18 inches will be fine. Oh, it's a 3-pack and I like that is has 14,519 ratings and it's 5 stars. The small port on the Sata SSD is for Data, this Sata Cable that you are buying from Amazon is what attaches to it. The bigger one is for the Power Connector. Speaking of which, the Power Connector is keyed, meaning it only goes on one way. You might want to look at the ends of the cable to see which end is up. Don't over-think this, installing a SSD is pretty straightforward, and like I said, the cables only go on one way.

Keep me posted on when you get things. I’m a bit curious about the Z9.

Thank You!!

Well, the good news is, you don't have a lot of gear. The bad news is, none of your existing gear will be worth it to use on the Z9. Out of what you have, the 50mm 1.4G with a FTZ Adapter will technically work, but to be honest, I hate that stupid lens. LOL!! (Don't get me started. It was one of Nikon's worst lenses and has caused so many threads when I had Ask Brian on FB.) Anyway... So you are starting from scratch. Since you are also switching lens mounts, this also works in your favor; though your wallet won't tend to agree. It seems that you are a "Zoom Person," which is what I am. Some folks are "Prime Lens People," which also works, though you change lenses more often. Each has their pluses and minuses. Start with: Nikon Z9 Camera Body QTY of 1 (Extra) - Nikon EN-EL18d Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery (10.8V, 3300mAh) Nikon BL-7 Battery Chamber Cover Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Lens QTY of 4 - SanDisk 128GB Extreme PRO CFexpress Card Type B SanDisk Extreme PRO CFexpress Type B Card Reader This is the basic kit I would purchase. You could swap out the 24-70 f/2.8 S for the Nikon 24-120 f/4 S Lens, which has a bit more reach at the cost of one stop. (It only goes as wide as f/4) The lens hood on the 24-70 is reversible which makes things easier to carry around and store in your bag. Between the two, while the 24-120mm covers a bit more focal range, you can't go wrong with a 24-70, as the optics are better on the 24-70. My 24-70 is my most used lens, even though my 70-200 is my favorite lens. I couldn't imagine shooting without one these days. You could hold off on the battery for now, as the Nikon Z9 Battery lasts all day. Of course, if you shoot a lot of video, it will drain faster. I still recommend getting an extra battery and the Little BL-7 Battery Door Cover. What that BL-7 does is it attaches to the extra battery and stays on. Then it's just a matter of turning the little key flap and swapping the batteries. Otherwise you will have to transfer the BL-7 door from your other battery. This slows things down and opens you to bad things happening. I'd rather spend the $40 for the extra door to go with the extra battery. I can swap a battery on my D4s in under two seconds, or less, if I'm really in a hurry. You will see what I mean when you get your Z9, as you will have one battery and one battery door cover. I hope you read this tonight, because Sandisk is running a Sale on the CF Express Type B, so even though you don't have the body, it's always a good thing to save some cash!! (Sale ends Aug 27th.) My Recommendations For Kid's Sports (Wildlife) Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Lens This is another staple in a Photographer's arsenal. It's my go-to zoom when I need more reach or want to be creative. Nothing beats a 70-200 f/2.8 lens. Nothing. It's the "Les Paul Guitar" of Lenses and the 24-70 f/2.8 is like a "Fender Stratocaster." You could get the f/4 version to save a little money and weight, but you can't go wrong with a 70-200 f/2.8 lens. Yes, these lenses are expensive but the Z Mount is Nikon's new mount and the old F-Mount is going away...well eventually. A good high-quality lens will last you 20 years and I've gone through multiple body upgrades but kept / used the same lens. This is where you spend your money, on the glass. You can shoot Wildlife with this lens, though depending on what you shoot, it may not have enough reach to photograph something like a Bear. That said, you do have cropping options with those 45.7 MP. I have shot my son's baseball games with a 70-200 without any issues, and again...it's my go-to lens when I need some reach. For Wildlife (Kid's Sports) Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Lens This is a relatively new lens, but I like the focal length. The downside is the lens is a variable aperture, meaning as you zoom out, the lens automatically stops down. Your current lenses do this, so you are used to it. That said, when you experience f/2.8 glass it's hard to go back to the variable aperture stuff. Meaning, you tell the camera what aperture you want and it doesn't argue. Want to be at f/3.2 at 70 mm? Go for it. Want to be at f/2.8 at 24mm? That's fine too. Whatever your aperture you choose, it stays there. That said, chances are you are going to be at f/8 - f/11 when shooting wildlife or even f/5.6. If you want a lens with a similar focal range and a constant aperture, you are looking at a lens that's over $13,000 all by itself. So...for us mortals we just need to deal with it. LOL!! In a nutshell, this lens is great for the typical wildlife shots and if you happen to go on an African Safari, there is always a Lens Rental Company to utilize. If I was buying a Z9 and looking for a "Wildlife Lens" to use here in the States, I'd pick this one. Just like the 70-200, you could shoot Kid's Sports with this lens, as the 400mm will give you double the reach over the 200mm focal length. The downside? The variable aperture. You will not be photographing Football games in the Fall during the evening at f/5.6. Well, not unless you crank your ISO. You also won't be able to isolate your subject by blurring out the backgrounds at f/5.6. With Photography, there is always a trade-off. If you shoot Wildlife A LOT, chances are you will lean towards this lens. If you are shooting your Kid's Sports and have any sort of night games, having a 70-200 f/2.8 at your disposal is a God-Send. For Macro Photography (Mushrooms and such) Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens Want to do Macro? This is the Lens to do it with. You learn to use this lens at f/8 and will end up using it mostly at f/11 because the closer you get to your subject, the more you will have to stop down since the DoF is so small. It's razor thin when you are 3-4 inches away from something like a Mushroom. This is why serious Macro Shooters not only have this lens, but also some sort of Lighting Rig to illuminate their subjects, since the Apertures are so small. If you look at any of Susan Stripling's famous Wedding Ring Photos, she uses f/11 A LOT. Honorable Mention / Highly Recommend you purchase this to go with your 24-70 f/2.8 S Nikon Circular Polarizer II - 82MM Version. If you are into Landscapes or shoot Waterfalls, you NEED a Circular Polarizer. A Circular Polarizer makes your colors pop, and controls glare on thing like Windows and Water. Take a look at my Instagram Stream to see what I mean. If you'll notice, my skies in my Landscape shots are nice and blue and the Whites in the Clouds also pop. This is due to a Circular Polarizer Filter. This is the only effect that can not be duplicated in Photoshop; the reason is how a CP works, it only lets in Light Photons that are oriented in a certain way into the lens. Neither Photoshop or any other software can truly mimic this effect, because it happens before the light enters the lens. A CP Filter is a Landscape Photographer's Best Friend. Well that's what I would recommend. Hopefully you will see this and pickup the Sandisk Cards while on sale. Since you are going to photograph sports, I really-really-really want you to read your Nikon Z9 Manual and really learn the Autofocus Modes and each of the different Autofocus systems. Especially on how they differ from one to the other and when to use a particular one. I just read an article from a Photographer who primarily does Landscapes, but also wanted to capture Birds in flight. On the first day of him borrowing a Z9, he didn't have many keepers until he watched some YouTube Videos and read some articles about the Z9 Focusing Modes and how to set the camera up for a particular shot. The second day he had A LOT more keepers and was quite happy. Speaking of which, the Nikon Z9 is Nikon's Professional Grade Flagship Body. It is NOTHING like you are used to shooting with. Not just the raw power & build quality but things like the Menu Choices...there are so many choices. The DX bodies NEVER go near this stuff. You have no idea on what you are missing, so please-please-please RTFM (Read the F*cking Manual) when you get your Z9.

I'm sure your eyes widened when you saw that $10,000 number. Welcome to FX. Welcome to shooting with the Nikon Z9. Short Answer: NO. Long Answer: In order to take full advantage of the power of a Nikon Z9, it requires either high-quality professional grade lenses, like a AF-S 105mm f/1.4 with the Adapter, or better yet, Nikon "S" Lenses, which is the Mirrorless Body line of Lenses meant for those bodies. Speaking of which, I have a friend who shoots newborns, and she switched from her Nikon D4 to a Nikon Z6 as she was having hand issues with the weight of the D4. She kept using her existing 24-70 f/2.8 and used the FTZ adapter. Her photos were "fine," but seemed off. She pixel-peeped and pixel-peeped and was driving herself nuts because the photos just seemed "Off." (It was hard to describe.) Well, after talking her down from the proverbial ledge, I convinced her to give the Nikon 24-70 "S" lens a try and see what happens. I told her you could always return it, but I have a feeling your issues will go away once you switch, because that lens is meant for Mirrorless bodies and you will get the 5 Axis Vibration Reduction." Sure enough, she got the lens and her problems went away. She had way more keepers and her photography even improved because she started to see issues in her technique. So after having this real-world experience, I've come to the conclusion that if you are going to switch to the Nikon Mirrorless Line, you are going to need the Mirrorless "S" Lenses to go with it. Period. (Especially if you have the DX only lenses.)

My next question is, "Why a Nikon Z9?" I get it...it's the Marketing and YouTube Videos and all the awards. All those articles and Blog posts. I'm sure there is "Last Camera Syndrome" at play as well. The, "I'm tired of buying cheap cameras. I want one that will last!!" or "This is going to be the last camera that I buy, so I'm going for a good one!!" If this sounds anyway remotely familiar, I'm glad you are talking to me first, before taking the plunge. I also want to take the time and give you a major head's up: Your photos will suck when you switch over to FX. It is, but it takes getting used to. Takes about a month or so for you to adjust, and when you do, your DX body will feel / act like a toy. Because a DX Sensor is physically smaller, it only uses the center-most portion of a lens, which is the "best" part of the lens. It's almost like always eating Filet Mignon and then eating the other parts of the steak, which have a little more gristle and fat. Same difference. You will be surprised on how quickly you will see the flaws in your lenses, especially in the corners when you switch to FX. Because the FX sensor is physically larger, it picks up this stuff that the DX body couldn't see. Combine that with the "Angle of View" change, also takes getting used to. You can't simply "f/2.8 all the things" like you could on a DX body, it doesn't work that way. f/2.8 on a DX body is closer to f/4 on a FX body. Why? Because the FX Sensor is physically larger the DoF Changes. You no longer have to multiply the focal length by 1.5 to get the "Equivalent" Focal Length. This is why a 50mm 1.8 lens is used for portraits a lot on a DX body. For a FX Body, you need an 85mm f/1.8 lens to produce the same "Look." Since the Angle of View is different, it forces you to change your shooting position on where you stand, thereby changing the Depth of Field. Understand? Of course, if you don't have f/2.8 glass, you have no idea on what I'm talking about. Which could be a good thing, since there won't be any existing habits and ways of thinking. Here is a comparison between a Nikon D700 (FX) and a Nikon D7000 (DX) from an old friend. A tripod was used and it was the same lens between each of the body. The camera did not move and it's a quick-and-dirty way of seeing what the "Angle of View" change between a FX/DX body that I'm talking about. OK...get me your list of gear and computer / storage specs. I need to see your "Whole Eco-System" so you "Buy it Right - Buy it Once." I hate wasting money on this shit...and trust me, I've wasted plenty.

Finally!!! A camera question, in the Photo Gear & Equipment section!!! I'm so happy right now. Yeah, Z9 questions are non-existent here, as this is a pro-body, and people who buy those cameras are typically Pros. BUT! I will answer your question as to save you a bit of a headache. Of course, I'm having a little fun. But I have helped a lot of people over the years, both here and on FB that have been in your situation. They want to ditch the "Crop-Sensor Training Wheels" and switch to Full Frame (FX.) Unfortunately, there is more that they need to look at than just the fancy marketing that's out there trying to get you to buy. So here's the thing: It's not just the camera body and lens. Nope. It's things like CFExpress Type B Cards and a Reader. An Extra Battery. Plus all the other accessories. Then "S" lenses, and then the camera body. Can you feel the $$$ signs adding up? Which leads me to the next paragraph. But wait! We aren't done. That fancy Nikon Z9 Camera Body. It's won all sorts of awards. "It's amazing!!" Everyone says so. It also has 45.7 MP, which is the same amount as my Nikon D850...and the camera body that I regret buying. Why? It's because of that D850 and it's 45.7MP. My Raw files are huge because I don't use any fancy compression for my photos. They are close to 100MB...each. So I had to not only buy a new fancy iMac to handle the files, which was around $3200 on top of the money that I spent on the D850, I also had to upgrade my computer to 64GB of RAM, so it wouldn't cry during post. Then, I soon found out that the existing lenses that I had, the 24-70, 70-200 VRII and 14-24, all but one of them sucked on my D850 and that stupid 45.7MP camera sensor. It needs the absolute best glass to produce the best results. So that was another $4000 or so in lenses on top of the D850 camera purchase. See where I'm going with this? It's not just the camera and lens, it's the whole eco-system behind the camera. That's what will cost you. The $4500 camera body, that's easy. It's all the other stuff. Especially your computer and storage that you have currently. I will warn you, if you have a computer that's a few years old with full HDs, you are going to be spending A LOT more than you think you will. Just like my stupid D850. That single purchase ended up costing me around $8000 (or more) when it was all-said-and-done. Honestly? I should have stayed with my Nikon D4s, but camera bodies in that class tend to be large, which attracts all sorts of attention. "Wow!!! That's a NICE camera, that must take awesome photos!!!" "I've never seen a camera that big, wow!!" I've heard it each and every-time that I've gone on a bus trip. Everyone thinks they have "A Nice Camera," then they see mine. Which reminds me. Professional Gear and Lenses ARE QUITE HEAVY. Yes, Mirrorless Bodies are a bit lighter, but going from 5lbs to 4lbs still is kinda heavy after walking around all day. Remember, you are shooting with Professional Gear, not a Nikon D3500 with plastic lenses. The Lenses are physically larger, and are made of metal/high quality plastics. During a Wedding, I will have my D4s, Flash-Rig, SB-5000 and 70-200 lens mounted, all the fancy stuff, which ends up me holding 7lbs+ of gear. (That works out to be around 3.18 Kilograms). Here is a quick photo that I just took of my Nikon 24-70 f/2.8E and a Large Yeti 30 oz Tumbler: Hopefully this will give you an idea of just how large is large. The 70-200 f/2.8 lens is even bigger: (70-200 f/2.8E - Yeti 30 oz - 24-70 f/2.8E. Lens Hoods for each lens are on L/R) That sucker is 3lbs all by itself and the reason I named my 70-200 "Bertha." Because she's large and powerful and gets shit done. Now that's out of the way, I don't want to completely discourage you; the local camera stores don't exist as they once did and the local Best Buy (or equivalent) store usually doesn't have the "Pro-Grade" stuff on display. So you are forced to buy online, sight un-seen and I want you to make an informed purchase. Combine that with DX gear and lenses. The plastic stuff. I'd hate for you to blow $8393.88 and be surprised. (That's the price of a Nikon Z9, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 S Lens, and Two 128GB Sandisk Express 128GB Type B Memory Cards as the Z9 has dual slots.) Remember, we haven't even purchased more cards, a card reader and at least one extra battery. That adds another $825-ish on top of the $8383.88. Let's round off prices, $8395 + $825 = $9220. Plus Tax and any shipping. Here in PA, our sales tax is 6%. Yours might be higher where you are. If I multiply $9220 by 6%, that comes out to $9773.20. So call it $9775. That is approximately $225 LESS THAN TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS, for a stupid camera! One Lens, One Camera Body, One Extra Battery, Two Sets of Memory Cards & Card Reader. Just under $10,000 after tax. Let that sink in. So before I go rattling on-and-on, you say "I'm not a pro..." Which is fine. I also have no problem recommending on what you need if price is no object as I'm very good at spending other people's money. So before I start linking things, I need to know what gear you have and what you typically shoot. Landscapes? People? Are you in Dark environments a lot? Do you shoot Sports and Action? List all your lenses and let me know of your computer specs. It's real easy to blow $12,000 - $15,000+ on this crap. Especially with the "Pro-Grade Stuff" that a Z9 will require. Trust me.

Yeah, that drive is fine. It’s a new model, but I like G-Drive’s stuff. Well, I think Sandisk owns them now? But they still make high quality items. I’d buy it.

Yeah, once you start wanting “faster” components in attempts to not be obsolete sooner rather than later, the cost really jumps up. I still think the $1699 model will work well for you. I’d buy it.

You could also upgrade to this Motherboard, the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero. Which is a "Better" Motherboard, but the cost increases. This is what that config would look like: Of course, the new cost is $3379. It's all about money. If you would like, give Digital Storm a call or setup a Chat Meeting. Tell them what you are doing and see what they recommend. As of right now, I think the $1699 is the "Best Bang for your Buck" model. It's the "$999 PC" from several years ago, or it's equivalent. Of course, you'll need to either use an exiting Keyboard and Mouse and have a IPS Display on hand. If you need those things, it adds to the cost. (Most Gamers like using their own keyboards and such, Digital Storm makes "Gaming" PCs, hence not having keyboards/mice as a standard option. Honestly? You could head to Best Buy or whatever and buy a Keyboard and Mouse for like $40 or so. Or again, if you have a Keyboard/Mouse that you like and works for you, and is USB based, save yourself some cash.

Here is the specs that I chose: i9 CPU ASUS Prime Z690-A (Intel Z690 Chipset) (Up to 3x PCI-E Devices) (No SLI) (DDR5) 32GB DDR5 5200MHz FURY Beast Power Supply left at 850 Watts. Upgraded the SSD m.2 Drive to a Samsung 970 EVO Plus verion instead of generic. Selected the GeForce RTX 3070 8GB Downgraded the OS to Windows 10 Professional 64-bit. I will upgrade to Windows 11 in 2025, waiting for it to "Cook" in the oven for a few more years. Windows 10 Pro is worth the extra $50. When things go wrong, it's easier to fix things since it stays out of your way. You could select Windows 10 Home 64-bit though. Up to you. That configuration will cost you $3064 before shipping and tax. I could add more, but honestly? I can buy a 2nd HD off of Amazon and install it. Here is a Western Digital Black 10TB Version. You can add this at a later date. I would use this HD just for storage of my image files / data. I could help you install the drive, it's actually really easy to do. Windows 10 Pro makes it really easy to setup as well. Takes about 20-30 minutes, depending on your skill level.

Alright, I had a little fun and built a system that you could grow into. So far I'm up to $3064 and can keep going. If you want to spend that kind of money, I can share the specs that I would pick for me. Otherwise, the $1699 is a good deal for what it is. It just sucks to be in the market right now for a new computer, though...prices have come down. That $1699 system would be closer to $3000 in 2020/2021.

You can add hard drives and other things over time with that computer. You could technically lower the Power Supply to 700 Watts or 750 if you wanted to. That would save a few dollars too. I tried using the "Customize" version of the Lynx, and you get better hardware, but the cost jumps up to at least $2500-ish, which sounds out of your budget. You might just want to stick with picking the Lynx on the left and choosing the $1699 version. Click "View Configs" under the $999 Model and then scroll down to the bottom. You should see the $1699 version. For those wondering, go here: Digital Storm - Lynx.

"Close but no Cigar!!!" I love the Digital Storm Lynx. Here is what I would purchase: Basically a Intel i9 is really overkill for Photoshop. In fact, I have a feeling you are going to have more Photoshop issues with a lower-end Video Card in your configuration. What I would do is take the savings on getting a i7, and put those settings towards a BETTER VIDEO CARD. The current versions of Photoshop really utilize the VIDEO CARD WITH DEDICATED VIDEO MEMORY now more than ever. I know everyone has been so hung up on the CPU, which is the primary "Speed" thing for the last 30-40 years, but in reality, the current versions of Photoshop really are taxing Video Cards. 4GB of VRAM is just not enough; you want 8GB at a minimum, with 16GB not out of the question. I find that a NVIDIA GTX 3070 8GB Video Card is the "Best Bang for your Buck" Model, and is my go-to recommendation. The other thing I would do, is bump up the RAM to 32GB. But you can do that later if money is tight.

Yeah, you really want at least 1TB for the main internal Macintosh HD. a 512GB will "Work," but you need to by hyper-anal on what is installed on that drive. After formatting, the MacOS, and programs...not to mention the PS Scratch Disk plus the cache area for the MacOS, and space becomes a Premium really quick. No. You bought a Mac with a small HD, and you will be dealing with that HD regardless. You can't use a 1TB External to boot from and as a substitution. That's why I recommended getting something like a 12TB drive on TB3. Right. You can not compare speeds between SSD and a Traditional HD spinning at 7200RPM. Totally two different beasts. SSD will always win because there are no moving parts. Yeah, if you are on the go, you are going to need a SSD Drive. The G-Drive, while excellent drives and I own several, do not like to be moved around. Bottom Line: I feel a SSD TB3 or even a TB4 drive is in your future. Unfortunately, it will come at a Price-Premium. Don't fall down the Marketing with all the buzzwords about Throughput and Bandwidth and such; those numbers are based in a controlled laboratory...NOT REAL-WORLD SPEEDS. Kinda like my ISP, I have Gig Internet from Comcast, which technically is 1000Mbps, but I only get 940 Mbps down due to the Ethernet overhead issues. (I will save you the particulars so your eyes don't glaze over as to the why.) Anyway, those speeds on paper sound good, but in reality, SPEED IS RELATIVE. It's only "Fast" for a few days or so, maybe a week. Then it becomes your "Normal." Remember that. Basically, get a SSD that's fast, with a decent warranty and larger than you'll think that you need. (2TB-4TB.) I'd skip the 1TB for an external drive.

OK, a few things here. Yes, SSD is fast, I will give you that...but the problem is the USB interface, THAT is what creates a bottleneck. Even if it's USB 3.0. So while a Samsung SSD 1TB Portable like this one would be worth it if you are on the go, you are limited by your Mac's USB 3.0 port's speeds. So that drive would not be a "Internal HD Replacement/Supplement," or one that I would recommend working off of. Even if it's a SSD Drive. But that drive is great for storage and traveling. Second, Thunderbolt 3 is fast, MUCH faster than your 1Gbps Ethernet Port. Thunderbolt 3 is around 40Gbps, and if you combine that with a Enterprise-Grade 7200RPM HD, such as this model which I personally own and work off off, will be your best bet. For what you want to accomplish, you need at least a Thunderbolt 3 HD. I have a 12TB. If you want to go bigger, feel free. It just depends on the money you want to spend. Oh, one more thing! The G-Drives come with all necessary cables. Speaking of cables and BUS Powered. They are fine, but BUS Powered Drives aren't going to be that fast, usually around 5400RPM drives for the traditional spinning HD, which causes an additional Bottleneck. See how it all fits together? Take a 5400RPM HD, use USB 3.0 and it's not going to be that fast, at least not to work off of. Again, even if you get a SSD, USB 3.0 isn't that fast as compared to an Internal HD. The TB3 Drive is. Now, I just saw this drive. An 8TB SSD on a Thunderbolt 3 Interface. It's the "Best-of-Both-Worlds!" SSD AND TB3. The problem? It's $1600 freakin' Dollars!! (US Dollars.) For a 8TB Drive. Umm...that's a tough pill to swallow. That's almost the cost of a stupid Mac. If that drive was like 18TB, then it would be worth it. But we will need to wait a few more years for those 20TB SSD Drives to hit the Market. Bottom Line: I'd buy a 12TB-18TB Thunderbolt 3 G-Drive. I have a 12TB and it suits my needs just fine.

Really...my default search is for a Dell Ultrasharp IPS 27" Display that is 2560 x 1440 Resolution. If it has a Matte Coating or isn't Glossy, even better. That's all I do, is head to Amazon, and search "Dell IPS Ultrasharp 27" Display." That's it. That's the "Magic" that I do. Really-Really. I'm looking for IPS, either a HDMI or DisplayPort, Matte Coating or 3M Coating, basically a non-glossy screen. 4K is really over-rated and chances are you are just going to enlarge the display area anyway, just because 4K in a 27" screen makes everything so tiny.

On board Memory is RAM that is soldered to the motherboard. You can't change it or upgrade it. That Asus laptop seems to have 16GB soldered on the Motherboard and one RAM expansion slot that's occupied by a 16GB RAM Stick, which gives you 32GB. If you wanted to max out the RAM to 48GB, you'd have to remove the existing 16GB stick in the slot and install a 32GB Stick, thereby giving you 48GB of total RAM. (16GB Soldered + 32GB in the slot = 48GB). As for 48GB or 64GB...that really depends on the manufacturer. Laptops are meant for portability, but people have a love-affair with laptops and try to make them desktop replacements. If you want to do that, fine...but you are going to have to pony up the $$$'s to make that happen. 48GB is decent, but if you have a high mega-pixel camera, it may not be enough. I know my fancy 27" iMac from 2017 was not happy with my D850 files, which are 45.7MP, until I upgraded to 64GB. As with anything, you can't ever have enough RAM, Hard Drive Space, Video Card Performance (with at least 8GB of Dedicated Video Memory). Bigger-Better-Faster-More. It's never "Enough." Just when you think you've bought "Enough," you realize you should have spent a little bit more. It never ends.

That should work, but I have heard of mixed reviews with the LG Displays and new M1 Macs and such. I guess try it, make sure you calibrate it and compare the display to a physical set of prints. In reality, the only other real choice is the over-priced Apple Studio Display. But at $1600 or so, I can see why that would be a tough pill to swallow.

You know how much I loathe laptops, right? The latest versions of Photoshop are really killing Graphics Cards, you really want at least a NVIDIA GTX 3070 or better yet, a 3080 with at least 8gb of Video Memory. Especially if you plan on using a fancy external display. The choice of Video Card is so important with today's modern Photoshop. It's getting ridiculous. You are going to need to go bigger and more expensive. Buying a computer that's "Good Enough" no longer works in 2022 and going into 2023. Go Big or Go Home. Otherwise you are just wasting money and will most likely get 18-24 months out of that laptop. As far as the CPU...I'd rather you put savings from getting a slightly slower CPU and put it towards the beefiest graphics card that you can afford or upgrade to. I'm dead serious. Today's modern Photoshop relies on the Video Card more than a CPU for performance. So that laptop..."Meh."

Nope. The video card is under-powered. You really want a NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 or 3080. Again, it sucks to be in the market for a new computer. It's even worse since you seem to live in OZ. Your budget should be around A$ 4000. I'd recommend this one: https://www.dell.com/en-au/work/shop/desktops-workstations-all-in-ones/xps-desktop/spd/xps-8950-desktop/smhdx89508400au?view=configurations