Brian

If you are THAT worried about the AI stuff, then you are starting with the Mac Studio that costs $4000. It's the Neural Engine part of the M2 Series Chip that deals with the AI stuff. Personally, it all depends on how much money you want to spend. I don't think it's necessary to blow another $1200 on the M2 Upgrade, it just seems silly at this point. AI is so new, and I'd hate for things to abruptly change and your "investment" no longer applies. Photoshop relies more on the GPU and a Mac Studio with a 38-Core GPU should give you years of life. Now, if you want more RAM, that's fine. You could bump things up to 96GB, same thing goes with the internal HD. Just make sure your external drive that you use for Time Machine is double the capacity of your internal drive. Or you can upgrade to 96GB, keep the HD at 1TB and purchase a external Thunderbolt Drive that is 18TB or 20TB, for about the same money as you would spend it on upgrading the M2 Chip.

Asus ROG Laptops are fine. I've also recommend Lenovo Laptops, such as this model. The only laptops that I actively avoid are HP laptops. While they used to be great, about 20 years ago, the current models just suck.

Yes. The only thing that concerns me is the fancy rainbow-colored LED Lighting along the bottom/edges. While it's fancy and cool effect for Gamers, since you are likely editing photos, the color casts caused by them would be a nightmare. I would make sure you can turn that feature completely off before editing or calibrating anything. Other than that, this laptop checks all of my boxes.

Skip the MSI laptops. You do not need the fancy rainbow colors along the edges while editing photos. Talk about color casts. Between all of your choices, I'd go with the Lenovo for $2999 or the alternative version of $2599. "This CPU is faster..." That's thinking from 30 years ago. Photoshop really wants a faster GPU (Graphics Card) with dedicated Video RAM. So for $400 more, you are doubling the internal HD and getting a better video card (RTX 4080.) If you can swing the $2999, go for that one. Why that Lenovo? Because it has a IPS screen in it, which is meant for editing photos. Of course, it's not written on the website, but B&H has that same laptop model number and it does state that it's a IPS Screen and is Matte.

Now, at the end-of-the-day, as cliche as that phrase is... It's your money and you are in-control on how you spend it. After all, I'm just a guy on the internet who hates wasting money on this shit. Just like you are "Asking Damien" in Ask Damien, you are "Asking Brian" on what he would do. He wouldn't cheap out because all that's going to do is cost you more money in the long run. Sure, you can go the cheaper route, but I almost guarantee that you'll be in here sooner or later bitching about your cheap-ish laptop; remember, Today's Modern Photoshop requires a computer that you NEED, rather than one you can afford. Gone are the days of the $999 Computer Special from a Big Box Store that was "Good Enough." Photoshop is becoming a BEAST. It's also Professional-Grade Software and with anything "Professional," you are expected to keep your Computer Hardware Current, it's the cost of doing business. Regardless what Samantha Jane from CutesyName Photography tells you otherwise. Sure, you can find deals, but Apple penalizes you for going cheap. Since there is no upgrading ANYTHING after the fact, if you find that your Mac Laptop that you cheaped-out on is now not handling the PS version released 2 years from now. So now you are forced to buy ANOTHER laptop and do this all over again. I'd much rather build a fancy and robust computer and be done with it. I usually have a 7-8 year lifespan in mind with my configurations. That's why they cost more; because it's a "Buy it Right, Buy it Once" way of thinking. Or I could blow $2000-$3000+ every 24-36 months. I also put my Money where my Mouth is. I'm still on a 2017 iMac. I'm on PS CC 2023 and Big Sur. I need to replace this iMac, but I just bought a Toyota Truck tonight and need to get that paid off before I buy a new stupid Mac. Plus there is other shit to buy / save-up for.

That's because I don't configure a 14" MacBook Pro for photo editing. I configure a 16". You also need to include AppleCare and any applicable sales taxes. Did you see this link? I walk you through step-by-step. What is a good Mac Laptop for Photo Editing in 2024? Here is a screenshot of the configuration: Cost before AppleCare & Tax: $4199.00 Now, I tend to round-up. It might be less than $4600...but it still will be above the $4000 mark. Even Mac Desktops cost that much. Just think, if you lived in Australia, this price would be closer to $8000. Remember, everything is more expensive in 2024!! Shithole homes by me are going for $400,000 - $500,000. Or more. New Vehicles start at $60,000...used Vehicles start around $32,000. Food costs more. Eating out at Olive Garden or other similar establishment could cost you around $100+ and that's without alcohol. Eating a Big Mac Meal at McDonald's can set you back $16 in some areas of the country. By me, they are around $12-$13 after tax. While it's great that fast-food workers are getting paid more money, the rest of us aren't. Now...I'm going to stop now before I really go off ranting. Anyway, Macintosh Computers have ALWAYS-ALWAYS-ALWAYS been expensive. It was just for a period from 2009-2020 when they were "Affordable," and that's what is throwing people off. The original Macintosh Computer released in 1984 cost $2499.99. Adjusted for inflation, that amount would be: $7,692.51 in today's money. So call it $7699.99. You get A LOT more computer for less money than you would have in 1984. But I get it. It still sucks. Keep saving and just deal with using an older version of Photoshop and the current MacOS that you are running. Believe me, you aren't missing on THAT much. At its core, Photoshop CC is still not much different than CS6. It's just all the fancy tools and the FOMO is what gets you.

I wouldn't. But it's a free country...so if you want to make your life difficult...go ahead. Bottom Line: Start saving for a new computer/laptop. The 16GB RAM and the Radeon Pro 560X 4GB day's are numbered when it comes to Photoshop. The CPU is fine, it's just everything else. The problem is, Photoshop just isn't PS anymore. It's an AI Generator, it's a bunch of fancy bloatware, which requires more horsepower from a computer. Not just the CPU, but at least 32GB RAM, a beefy video card GPU with at least 8GB - 12GB of dedicated Video Memory, 1TB main HD. So there is four things you need to worry about. Now to increase the difficulty of things, plus driving up the price...Apple now has built everything into a Single Chip. So there is NO upgrading ANYTHING after the fact. Which is why I recommend members here upgrading a few things and a new Mac that will last you 7 years or so, will cost about $4600 (US Dollars.) What trips people up, is they are so worried about the CPU speed, they forget about everything else. I would have liked you to get a i7 Mac Laptop but with more RAM and had a better video card with more video memory. Chances are, that wasn't an option if you started with the lower-price Mac Laptop. Apple penalizes you for going cheap, they want you to "Go Big or Go Home." In fact, I wouldn't even bother with the current versions of PS! We have had a few users that did upgrade their OS, and Apple updated the Video Card Drivers and now take a wild guess who has a problem with this? That's right, Photoshop! So now we have people that have sessions to edit, are on a deadline, and Photoshop doesn't play nice with the current drivers being used for a old laptop. (Yes, 2019 is "old" when it comes to a Laptop.) Which makes them "Dead-in-the-Water." Apple has turned off the ability to downgrade at this point, so if things do go sideways...you are completely erasing / formatting your HD, installing an older MacOS and then re-installing EVERYTHING from scratch. Not my idea of a good time. Again...start saving if you haven't already. Photoshop is becoming a BEAST and new versions keep being released with more-and-more Bloatware / AI Crap. Gone are the days of CS6 and being able to run it for 15 years. Remember, Adobe Photoshop is a Professional-Grade piece of software and Adobe expects you to keep your hardware current. Regardless what the masses tell you otherwise. I'd love to upgrade my 2017 iMac and Photoshop, but I'm stuck as well and have other things to purchase before a new stupid $4600 computer.

Please watch some YouTube Tutorials BEFORE taking ANYTHING apart. There are kits that help you with disassembly, and things you need to know prior to taking out the screen. A 27" iMac is not like a regular computer; the only thing that's accessible is the RAM upgrade. Anything else, like the HD...and you are taking the damn thing apart and it's VERY easy to crack the screen. Oh, you will also need special glue strips to mount the screen back, hence the need for a kit. Personally, I wouldn't take my iMac apart and I've been a computer tech for 31 years. Too much of a Pain-in-the-Ass for my taste. Good Luck!

Yes, I think it's done via the Thunderbolt Port? I've never done something like that, you'd have to Google it.

No. My 2017 27" iMac, with 64GB RAM, a upgraded i7 CPU, 1TB SSD and the upgraded Video Card that has double the Video Memory... Is barely keeping up with Photoshop 24. It was a mistake going past PS 22. I also will not upgrade past Big Sur. Photoshop has become such a BEAST with all the stupid AI and Bloatware, you need a current machine to run it. Not something from 2017. Yes, I'm sure it's "Affordable." Don't waste your money, you are throwing it away. In fact, send it my way if you want to get that money off your hands, I take donations. Bottom Line: Keep Saving. Yes, I know it sucks. But with the upgrade cycles of PS CC, we will be on PS Version 27 before you know it.

How old is your Mac? We have had more than one member have all sorts of Video Card issues with Sonoma. So while it may install just fine, you could have quirky problems with Photoshop. I'm still on Big Sur, even with my fancy 27" 2017 iMac, with the "upgraded" components at the time...I won't dare upgrade. If you do decide to take the plunge, remember...if you want to downgrade, you are completely nuking your main hard drive and installing everything from scratch.

If you can afford 64GB, do so. With the current Macs, they are known as "System on a Chip." Which means things like RAM, the CPU Speed, the Graphics Processor and HD controller are all built into a single chip. There is no upgrading after the fact. Basically, Mac Computers are like glorified iPads and if you want "more" of something in a few years, you are buying a whole new computer. Apple forces you to purchase any upgrades you might like, at the time of purchase. So make sure you get at least 64GB of RAM AND a 1TB Main HD.

The M3 Studio hasn't been released yet. In fact, Apple just announced the M4 Chip for iPads and such, so for all I know, the "new" Mac Studio could have a M4 chip in it in 2025 or 2026, or whenever Apple decides to upgrade the Mac Studio. They might skip the M3 chip in the Studio altogether, but who knows? In my buying a Mac in 2024 Article, I configure a Mac Mini and upgrade A LOT of things, or I take the base Mac Studio and tweak a few things. When you compare the costs between a tricked-out Mac-Mini and a base Mac Studio, the Mac Studio is roughly $50 more and you get the following: The slightly better M2 Max Chip, which has more CPU Cores (12 vs 10) and more GPU Cores (30 vs 16.) The Neural Cores are the same, both have 16 Core Neural Engines each. What is so important about the Neural Engines? AI Technology uses Neural Engines, so as we progress with AI over the years, this part of the CPU Chip will become more important. Support for up to FIVE external displays. 10Gb Ethernet vs 1Gb Ethernet Two additional USB-C Ports & one SDXC Slot (Located on the front.) Better cooling fan and airflow. Heat is the enemy of electronics. The cooler the electronics, in this case the M2 Max Chip, the better it performs. The downside to a Mac Studio over a Mac Mini? The Studio is physically larger in terms of height. So you might have to fiddle with its placement on your desk. That's it. For another $43, you are getting a WAY better computer. Plus, the M2 Max Chip with more GPU Cores will handle Photoshop CC 2024 with two Apple Studio Displays better. The downside? is you are purchasing two $1600 displays, which add to the cost. The M2 Max Chip with a 12 Core CPU, 38GPU and 16 Neural Engine is MORE THAN FINE FOR PHOTOSHOP. The Mac Mini has a M2 Pro Chip, which is slightly less robust than the M2 Max Chip. Why not start with the M2 Ultra? Because it starts out at $4000 f-ing dollars!! That's why. And Photoshop won't take advantage of what makes a M2 Ultra Chip fast, so it's kinda a waste of money. In fact, years ago there was only about a 5-7% performance boost with a Intel i7 over a Intel i5. Even though the i7 was a "Better / Faster" CPU Chip, Photoshop wasn't programmed to take advantage of the Architecture that made a i7 so fast. Same rules apply here. My Mac Studio config with a M2 Max chip is overkill as it is for Photoshop, no need to spend / waste the extra $2000. Even though my configurations are a bit on the high side, I try to keep things economical for the majority.

Unfortunately, that computer case is WAY too small for a new GPU. RAM, sure...that will help. But a new Graphics card in your tiny case, you would need to do something like this: A Video Card like a NVIDIA RTX 4070...is HUGE!! Not only that, but you will need to upgrade your Power Supply as well, to accommodate the new Graphics Card. You ain't doing that. Your poor 2016 computer just can't handle things. Time for a new one, I'm afraid.

You will never win the "Catch Up" Game, unless you have the money sitting in your bank account, ready to go...at all times. I will say this, if your computer is on its last legs, go ahead and purchase a M3 Mac Studio. I guarantee you that M3 Studio will be light-years faster than what you currently have. In addition, since we are being forced to purchase the Apple Studio Display, you can always upgrade the computer at a later time and keep the display! The nice part with Apple, is the prices stay the same year-after-year. Sure there are minor adjustments, but by-in-large...prices are consistent. So a new Mac will set you back about $4600 this year...or in 2025. If you haven't already, give this article a read. The Mac Studio that I've configured has a lot of life in it, at least for the next 7 years or so. Remember, folks in this group tend to use Photoshop and even though it's getting more bloated and AI-based, it's still Photoshop.

If you are staying with Mac, the next round of updates should apply to the Macbooks and Mac Minis, and they will have M4 Chips. Other computers, like the Mac Studio, will likely see an update to M4 in 2025, possibly late 2025. At least that's what the rumors have stated. So keep saving and make a educated decision this coming October. I do not see any major upgrades for computers and such for June; likely it's just iPad Updates and the MacBook Air line. Yep. This is a very common issue and Sandisk seems to be one of the hottest in the market, temperature-wise. The faster something runs, the more heat it generates. With the bandwidth that CFExpress has, it's no wonder things get a little toasty. I have seen some CFExpress Readers that are mostly made out of Metal, which helps with heat dissipation. But honestly? I'd try a Delkin CFExpress or a Prograde CFExpress card next. They seem to run cooler. Also, do not let the card sit in your reader when not in use and use a USB-C Cable hooked up to your Thunderbolt Port to do data transfers.

I'd recommend the Calibrite Display Pro HL (CCDIS3HL). As Damien pointed out, it will work fine with your current 2017 iMac, and will work fine with the new Apple Displays if you decide to upgrade to a new Mac. When I upgrade my 2017 27" iMac, that's the Calibrator that I'm personally buying.

Kinda of. Basically it's the same stuff, just the modern equivalents. (e.g., NVIDIA RTX 4070 or RTX 4080 instead of the 3070/3080.) Any current i7 or i9 CPU is fine, and I would get 32GB of RAM at a minimum, with 64GB being preferred. A main HD of 1TB Capacity still stands. But if you want to go to a 2TB drive, that's fine too. Yes and no. The benefit to getting a Dell XPS is Dell buys things in bulk, so prices are cheaper. Plus, their computers are built so that everything works...you don't need to fiddle with anything. If you do decide to build you own, you are picking out EVERYTHING and dealing with making things work together. But you will get higher quality components, BUT! you could also blow that $3500 budget out of the proverbial water if you go a little crazy when picking stuff. No matter how I configure things, when I start choosing components, I'm always around a $3000-ish price-point. That said, I also take things to "11" when I configure stuff. A running joke of mine is, "The two most dangerous things to a computer are a "Brother-in-Law" and a "14 year old Son." (Insert Teenager if you need to.) I actually once asked a woman who was going on-and-on about the things happening to her computer, and I asked, "By chance, did your Brother-in-Law tried "fixing" things?" Her mouth dropped and she looked me dead in the eyes and asked, "Yes!! How did you know?" I told her the story sounded familiar. (This was in the days before the Internet and people didn't have YouTube or people like me to ask questions.) Anyway...you could build one. If you can put a Lego set meant for a 12 year old together, you can build a computer. That said, there are techniques and rules to follow, but everything is standardized now, so things just fit together, provided you have a big enough case. Speaking of which, you will need a case that is large enough and a Power Supply that has enough umph to power everything, and choosing the correct motherboard, chipset, RAM to work with it AND putting the right amount of Thermal Paste on the CPU...plus dealing with cooling because heat is the enemy when it comes to electronics. In a nutshell, yes...you could build your own, but I would be prepared going down that Rabbit Hole if you do. Yes, your son will acquire skills, but at a price-point. When someone informs me that they built a computer, I often ask..."Just one?" Oh, one more thing. I...meaning ME...lose my Magical Tech Powers when it comes to working on my stuff. I can assemble $30,000 Servers and work on $100,000 pieces of equipment with no issues, but when it comes to MY STUFF, I break sh*t all the time. I just mention this because if something were to go sideways during install, you are on the hook for the cost of replacement. If you do want to go down this road, check out Linus Tech Tips on YouTube. There is a lot of info there that you can look over and see if building your own computer is right for you. It's actually funny when Linus drops things and/or breaks things during Computer Builds, and it's 100% genuine. LOL!! I usually recommend around $2400 - $2500 for a Computer and Display, at least for a Store-bought / Dell PC so you are covered there. Here is a Dell XPS that I configured with "2 Years ProSupport" Warranty Coverage: Dell XPS Desktop Now, if you go tweaking things, like bumping the RAM up to 64GB, that's fine. I will just add things to the cost. Either way, you will have a very nice setup for less than $3500. Especially if you purchase a new IPS Display and Calibration Device to go with it.

The nice part about upgrading to a Mac Studio is that you can keep the same Mac Studio Screen and just replace the computer in the future. It's not like a iMac where you are replacing the whole blasted thing at once. I agree, with all of this AI crap that Adobe is adding, you need to buy a machine that's complete overkill just to have some future-proofing. Unfortunately, that comes at a higher price-point. As for the 96GB of RAM, 64GB should be fine. 32GB is the minimum that I recommend these days, for either a Mac or Windows Box, and with 64GB being the current "Sweet Spot." If you really need 96GB of RAM, chances are you are buying a more powerful computer anyways.

I do large Panorama Photos with my Nikon D850 at full resolution. I have gone over 4GB for a .psd file on a semi-normal basis. So for me, 96GB is more practical. For normal folks, 64GB is FINE. I have a habit of taking things to "Eleven" with my configurations. The thing with the M-Line of Apple's products, there is no upgrading after the fact. That's why I'm going for 96GB, but I have my reasons. I also sometimes run Virtual Machines (Other Operating Systems in Containers) so having extra RAM works better for me. You? "Meh." I'd take the money you will blow on 96GB of RAM and put it towards AppleCare. Speaking of which... AppleCare is one of those things...you are better off buying it. Why? Because Apple is the only ones that services them. They do not sell parts to 3rd party repair shops. I realize you are in OZ, and your prices are insanely high as compared to the States, you have my sympathy. If you see any 3rd Party repair shops that do component level work, they are using parts from Donor-Boards / Cadaver Units. It's really a shame that Apple does things this way, but there are profits to be made, and fixing old computers hurts their bottom line. (According to them.) There isn't THAT much of a difference between a M2 and M3 chip. There are differences, don't get me wrong, but they aren't earth-shattering as Apple makes it to be. That's why they are comparing a M3 to a M1 chip with their advertisements...THAT'S where the difference is. M2 to M3? I'm thinking about a 20% - 25% difference? Maybe slightly higher? If you really want a M3, you are waiting to at least the end of this year. (Sept-October Time-frame.) Even then I don't expect much.

Yep. This is done for battery performance; often things like the CPU and other components do not run at full power when on battery, because people want laptops to be portable at all times and fast components draw more current. Unfortunately, if you have real work to be done, you will need them to be plugged in. This is a loaded question, and the answer will be determined on who you ask. Personally, I HATE-HATE-HATE Laptops for Photo Editing! In fact, there was a time period that I wouldn't give any recommendations at all, but I finally gave up. Why? Because people have a stupid love-affair with Laptops. They must be able to edit in the Living Room, Kitchen, in the Backyard by the Pool while watching their kiddos swim...one person wanted to edit in the passenger seat of her husband's car on the way to the beach!! People don't want to be chained to a desk!! They must be free to edit photos wherever they choose!! Who gives a sh*t about the ambient light around them which will affect their edits and white balance choices?!?! Being forced to be plugged in is for Losers!!! Consistent Lighting Conditions in the area that they edit is for Nerds!!! Besides, they bought an Action from Cutesy Name Photography that will fix that!!! It got to a point that I was beaten down by the inevitable, "What's a good laptop for photo editing?" question...over-and-over-and-over again. So I caved. Speaking of which, I need to write the 2024 version of that article. Spoiler Alert: IPS Screen, i7 or i9 CPU, NVIDIA RTX 4070 or RTX 4080 with at least 8GB Dedicated Video RAM, 1TB Main HD and at least 32GB of RAM is what you need in 2024. All kidding aside, regardless on what you edit on, it is far more important to edit in consistent even light with paint color on the walls that is neutral enough to not affect your editing choices. In fact, Damien wrote a really good article: The Light around your Computer about this very subject, give it a read. This is one of the reasons why a Desktop is better to edit on, you are in the same area for editing each and every time. If you edit in a room that has say...red on the walls, then go move to the Kitchen Table where walls are Yellow, with a warm overhead light fixture, you are going to have a color shift with the ambient light. Which affects the way you see things on screen. The other thing that makes Desktops better than Laptops, is the performance / horsepower of things. I don't care how much money you spend, Desktops run better not only because of faster/better components, the reason that they run better is due to one thing: Airflow. Heat is the enemy when it comes to electronics and the hotter something runs, the slower it performs. Desktops just have more physical area and way bigger fans to move air. Of course, this is subjective, as the type of Desktop that you would purchase determines this; A mini PC with a Tiny Fan vs a full Desktop with 4 big and powerful fans, there is a difference in operating temperatures. I don't care if you have the most expensive and fastest laptop, if that air duct / fan gets clogged with dust/hair/funk, it's not going to run well...regardless how new it is or how much you paid for it. Now, the other thing that I dislike about Laptops is one thing: Batteries. I'm sorry, Lithium Ion Batteries really haven't changed a whole lot technology-wise since the 1990's, and they wear out over a given period of time. Yes, even if you leave them plugged in, they have a "shelf-life." A good set of Lithium Ion Batteries will get you 36 Months or so of lifespan. Some go a little more, but don't hold a charge when they get to around 48 months, that's why it seems you are always buying a new laptop every three years or so. On a good day, a Lithium Ion Battery will just cut out unexpectedly, on a bad day, the battery materials inside the battery start to mix together, causing the battery to balloon and possibly catch on fire. This is how planes fall out of the sky if Lithium-Ion Batteries catch on fire and why Fire Departments can't put out a Tesla that's on fire, same difference. So what do you do? The #1 thing you need to answer is: What is your budget? Then increase it. Why? Because the days of the "$999 Special" from a Big Box Store that's "Good Enough" for Photoshop are over. Adobe keeps adding all sorts of crap and AI modules in order to 1. Stay current and 2. Keep you hooked on the Subscription Model. Personally, I recommend a budget of around $2500 for either a Laptop or a Desktop in 2024, give or take a few hundred. $2500 is a good target. Why? Because you need to be able to click "Buy" at a given moment's notice. You see, Laptop Models don't hang around as long as they used to; it's about 90 Days or so before they are replaced by a different model. 30 years ago, Manufacturers had a "Spring Line" and a "Fall Line," Apple still does this with the Early / Late Models, but the other manufactures keep changing things. So picking a Laptop, drooling over it, reading review article after review article, followed by YouTube Reviews and saving up each month to ultimately purchase what you desire...those days are from 20-30 years ago. Now? You see it - you like it - you click BUY!! Otherwise, it might be gone next week. This is why I always start with a price/budget first. Case in point: This Laptop I've been recommending over the last 3-4 months, and now it seems to be running low on inventory since "Limited Supply at this Price" is written at the top. Plus, this laptop is way less price-wise than it used to be. So it sound like it's due for replacement. This model checks all of my boxes and I would buy one myself. How about waiting for the new model? Meh...It's about the Laptop Screen: It must be an IPS Display Panel and those suckers are really hard to find in a Laptop. So really a Laptop and Desktop aren't THAT much different. The Latest Intel i7 or i9 CPU 32GB of RAM / 64GB Preferred 1TB of Main HD Capacity. (Do NOT buy a unit that has a 500GB or smaller main HD, laptop or desktop.) NVIDIA RTX 4070 or RTX 4080 with 8GB-12GB of Dedicated Video RAM A IPS Screen (I like 27" 2560 x 1440 resolution) or a IPS Display Panel in a Laptop. (Again, THIS is the tough part when buying a Laptop for Photo-editing, it's the damn IPS screen.)

The Creative Cloud "Mothership" App is required if you want to use Photoshop CC, Lightroom CC, etc. You will install the App, then use it to install PS, Bridge, ACR, etc. The App keeps track of what is installed, what your current license situation is, (basically if your subscription is current,) and you will get updates / patches to Adobe's products via the CC App. (The program that I often refer to as the Adobe Mothership App.)

It's fixed.

Yeah, sorry. That was me making a change behind the scenes. It’s supposed to be the only two people that can comment on a thread is the person creating the Post (You) and myself. Lately other people are jumping in threads and I was trying to figure out why. I will fix it when I get home tonight.

Now before you ask, a current Intel i7 CPU is WAY faster than your i5 from 2017. A i9, while nice, is a bit unnecessary for Photoshop. The reason? Current versions of Adobe Photoshop rely heavily on the Graphics Card (GPU) more than the CPU in 2024. That's right, it's not just having a lot of RAM, a large HD and fast CPU...that thinking was 20 years ago! Now Photoshop REQUIRES a big and powerful GPU and dedicated Video RAM for all of it's bloatware and add-on crap. Ahem!! I mean AI Features and enhanced Modules, like ACR, Liquify Tool, Lens Corrections, etc. I like the NVIDIA RTX 4070 with 8GB - 12GB of dedicated Video RAM. The next one up is the RTX 4080. Either is fine. I'd avoid getting the 4060 for long-term use; spend the extra and get at least a 4070 going forward.