Damien Symonds

You'll have to ask them. Every website is different. They'll need to tell you exactly what pixel dimensions their website requires. Resolution is completely irrelevant for web images. It can be 300, or 72, or 3000000000, or 7. Only the pixel dimensions matter. https://www.damiensymonds.net/2010/10/how-ive-been-sharpening-for-web-lately.html PDF? Are you sure? Can you show me exactly what their requirements say?

May I see one?

No. Yes, please do! I'm so curious.

Your proof setup isn't turned on, so that can't be it.

Yes, you gave me exactly the right screenshot. Also, your Clone Tool is set to "Current Layer" in the Options Bar. That's bad. It must always be set to "Current & Below".

I have absolutely no idea. I've never seen that before.

You're ON the smart object layer! I can see that you've made a blank layer for cloning, but you're not on it!

Do.not.rasterize.the.layer. May I see a screenshot?

Yes. For ultimate workflow safety, yes.

Don't forget that straightening (if required) should be the very first step in Photoshop. https://www.damiensymonds.net/2010/01/straightening-horizons.html

I have no idea, sorry. But I'm so excited for you. I'm so excited to see your photos with better focus. Your magnificent photography has been let down for the longest time by poor performance at high ISO.

In the bottom left corner there's a "Shortcuts" dropdown menu. That will be the way.

I'm SO sorry ... I know the answer to that on a PC, but I'm not sure about Mac.

I assure you, a home printer has no such cleverness. It prints a rough approximation of the file you send it, within its limitations.

Wonderful news!

You do need to calibrate again now that you've changed the brightness, yes.

Hi @Miksang Images, I have instructions for the SpyderX Elite. You'll find them here: https://www.damiensymonds.net/calibration.html

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I was more interested in this section. I don't see how you correlate that to a home printer.

Great. Then yes, follow "Part 9: Troubleshooting" which is about 3/4 of the way down this page: https://www.damiensymonds.net/cal_S5P_mac.html (It's the Spyder5 instructions, but the troubleshooting approach should be roughly the same).

So if you compared prints to screen in indirect sunlight, the comparison would be exactly the same?

That doesn't actually answer my question. Is your light good? Not too warm?

Are you SURE the light around your computer is ok? What you're describing is often the fault of light, not the screen or calibration.

Can you elaborate on this strange statement?

Which means they told you the wrong profile to use, as we suspected; and aren't willing to admit it. You're fortunate to be rid of that company. Glad you found a good one.

No. If anything, the opposite will be true. When soft-proofing for press printing it's most common to have to dull some very vivid colours of the RGB file to fit into the CMKY gamut. (In fact, this is true for RGB printing as well - did you see this thread?) No, definitely not. (As long as the soft-proofing and related adjustments are done properly, of course.) The balance will be fine. It's just that some colours might be a little duller by necessity. Yes, it wouldn't be too much trouble at all to put this simple extra step into your workflow, if you felt it was necessary. But heck, I wouldn't bother. For the small percentage of photos that would be affected, it's not worth it. Alas, yes. Again, though, it's only for a small percentage of images (ones with very vivid colours, eg flowers.) Not exactly. You would only have one file - the PSD file - with a specific Hue/Saturation layer for each print shop, which you applied in accordance with that shop's soft-proofing profile. Then for each print job you'd turn on the necessary layer, and turn the others off. (In case I haven't already mentioned this, the photos you put in the InDesign document are always PSD files. Never jpegs.) I agree. It would be wise to do a bit of testing to make sure you had a good system in place, but yes, it sure would save a lot of work. Is this something you're going to be dealing with a lot? Printing the same images at various print places?