Damien Symonds

No, that shit is NEVER the best method. Give me a few minutes ...

What? NO!!!!!!! You don't need new prints. The prints you already have are fine.

How's the print match now?

I'm aware of the change of interface (no, you don't have to do anything different) but not of the new values. Can you enlighten me?

At what point in the process is that popup appearing?

Ok, you didn't mention HDR in your original post, but it doesn't change anything. Please PLEASE don't wait too long to learn to do this properly. Ok, so this is where the BS is most evident. You've probably spotted it yourself. Jpeg files are 8-bit. And once data is 8-bit, it can never be genuine 16-bit again. So for your software (PTGUI) to tell you that it has magically turned your 8-bit jpegs into a 16-bit tiff is nonsense, of course. The Tiff part is a good idea, but the 16-bit part is just big-noting itself. Is the tiff file layered?

How did it turn out, @Rae?

Did you find out, @Sue Morris?

How did you go, @sturg80?

How did you go, @Shsp00?

@Crystal Felton?

Are you still there, @PSikes?

The answers to your questions lie, most likely, in resolution (PPI). No it doesn't. Increasing the size of a photo makes it neither worse nor better quality. It just makes it larger. If you had a print of a photo, and looked at it at arm's length, and it looked good, you'd be satisfied. If you then held that same print REALLY close to your nose, it would be much bigger to your eyes. Would you complain that it was suddenly a bad print? Of course not - it's exactly the same print, you're just looking at a much closer view. No it doesn't. The only possible explanation for this is that you're viewing at greater that 100%. Never do that. Good. Never use anything else. Right. And this is the clue. This statement is why I suspect you're messing up the resolution (ppi) when resizing. So, talk to me about your process. Firstly, what resolution does your lab require for prints?

Definitely haven't changed my mind. https://www.facebook.com/damien.photoshop/photos/a.183682458346830.39021.183680248347051/1711588222222905/?type=3&theater

Bit depth isn't really related to panoramas. I mean, if you like using 16-bit, and have sufficient computer power to do so, there's no reason not to. However, if you're a good photographer, there's really no benefit to it. High-bit data is necessary for photos where you need to make large tonal shifts (eg aggressive Levels or Curves) in Photoshop. As long as you manage your light well, shoot in raw format, and edit your raw files properly before taking the photos to Photoshop (or any other pixel editing program), 8-bit should be perfectly fine. May I know a bit more about your editing workflow? How do you make your panoramas?

Have you read that one, @kellyjonesphoto?

It can mean that, but it definitely doesn't automatically mean that. In fact, sometimes smaller jpeg file size actually means BETTER print quality, because it indicates a less noisy file. So, I hope the article has helped you understand why your jpeg files are much smaller than the raw files. That's very natural. One aspect that the article doesn't discuss, however, is the loss of quality each time you save another jpeg. And this is where you fucked up. It's because of Lightroom, of course, and I sincerely hope that you will abandon that shit very soon. Next, please read this article and let me know when you have done so.

Have you read it?

You have screwed up to a degree, but it's not too serious. Lots and lots of people make the same screwup. We'll discuss it once you've read the article.

Ok, this is good news. Now, read this article, and let me know when you have done so.

That is 22 megapixels. That's still 6 megapixels shy of what you told me your camera captures?

Well, choose the one that's closest to the normal size of the files that come out of your camera.

Gosh. And all the files, regardless of size, open into ACR ok?

No, PLEASE forget about the file size (in megabytes) at the moment. It is not important right now. You need to find out where and why the pixel dimensions of your file has been reduced.

No, there is no need for an alternative. Bridge is free, and works with Elements just the same as Photoshop. I discuss its installation and setup in the free module here. PLEASE don't wait a moment to take the Bridge Class.