Damien Symonds

Yeah, you'll need to use a low-opacity clone tool. I used 20%, I think.

Oh hell no. It must be PC.

Well, my part was just cloning.

Yes. Instructions

There has to be a bum crack. It'll look completely absurd without one.

Have you got good bulbs for your room yet? No they're not! Your prints are what they are. They never change. Either the light you're viewing them in is too warm, or your screen is too cold.

5000K lights should be good. How do you think their light compares to daylight? Yes, calibrate in dim light. But of course compare the prints to the screen in good light afterwards.

Like this?

Don't you think we should at least try and see how it looks with the nearer line gone?

Oh, wait, yes I do. But no, that wouldn't look realistic at all. It would be too chopped-off.

Well, that makes us square, because I don't know what you mean by this either, sorry:

Gosh, well done! I agree that the lighting works better at the RHS, but it's no biggie - go with where they want. The question I have is, have you sufficiently damaged the digital photo to match the quality of the scan? May I see a 100% crop?

Well ... duh. That's why I said:

Something like this?

Not at all. Do exactly the same.

I'm sorry I'm so dense. I don't get it. Can you circle what you want removed?

No, the answer is a yes. You have to get the white balance consistent.

I'm staring at this trying to figure out what I'm seeing. The right-hand line (further from camera) is probably the real one, isn't it?

Oh gee, this won't be easy. Which line do you want to remove?

This is not a crooked problem. You weren't square to the row of people. You should have moved to your right a bit. So I figure you'll have to distort the perspective and hope for the best:

It doesn't matter where the sun was. Her clothing and headband should have been exactly the same colour in your raw edits.

You rocked it!!!

500 does seem a bit big.

That doesn't say 100%?

No it's not. May I see a screenshot of your whole screen?