Jump to content

Damien Symonds

Administrator
  • Posts

    203,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3,096

Everything posted by Damien Symonds

  1. I'm ashamed to say I can't remember what came first in this chicken-and-egg scenario; whether the fallacy of working in a wide gamut space was already circulating the community before LR and Adobe jumped on board, or whether they lead it.
  2. This is not uncommon. Some people choose 350 for this very reason.
  3. Unless they can provide you with a bigger version of the photo, it won't look good I'm afraid.
  4. Can you steer them towards a canvas print? Canvas is more forgiving of enlargements.
  5. (Make sure you err a bit on the darker side for the subjects with your Levels work - that will help.)
  6. Yeah, that works. Slightly desaturating the yellows of the field, eh? And once you do your Levels work, the subjects will stand out well enough.
  7. I don't know what you're asking either, sorry
  8. Are you asking how to change the field grasses to a different colour?
  9. I think it would be tricky to get rid of it altogether, but it can certainly be diminished. What do you think of this? Levels layer: R 66/0.90/255 G 49/0.97/255 B 29/1.00/255
  10. Is this a recent problem, or has it always been this way?
  11. Of course not. They'll be ok, just not quite as good as they can be.
  12. Yes, if that suits you. There are two ways you can do it: Crop with nothing in the options bar, then use the Image Size function after that (with "Resample Image" checked) to resize them; or Crop with the "px" values in the options bar.
  13. You're absolutely right, they should be calibrated to give a very similar result. What you're experiencing here is most disappointing.
  14. Are your photos all landscape, or all portrait, or a mixture?
×
×
  • Create New...