Jump to content

Damien Symonds

Administrator
  • Posts

    203,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3,096

Everything posted by Damien Symonds

  1. It'll be no worse than any of the other photos on the page, if that's any consolation.
  2. Oh gee. I'm worried too But I don't see what else you can do.
  3. Thanks for posting. This is a very dangerous area. Please read this: https://www.damiensymonds.net/2011/05/please-be-wary-of-cmyk.html You MUST find out the correct profile to use.
  4. You can't tell how to do the second gradient if you have already done precise masking on the first gradient. You need to have some space around your subject. Remember this step?
  5. With Levels in the usual way. Make sure they all match BEFORE adding any gradient layers.
  6. No, that's just a flaw of your screen. Those lines aren't in the file.
  7. Oh crap!!! And Brian says you can't go any higher?
  8. https://www.damiensymonds.net/2010/06/faq-help-my-raw-files-wont-open.html
  9. All of this is based on this method: https://www.damiensymonds.net/preventing-banding-in-backdrops/ This one is also very important: https://www.damiensymonds.net/2012/10/using-photoshops-gradient-layer.html
  10. Download PSD First, I selected a few stripes with the marquee tool: Then added a gradient layer: Then modified the gradient layer to make the left-hand side as accurate as possible: Then loosely re-masked that layer all around them: Then added the second layer (clipped to the first one): Finally, masked the first layer for a smooth blend, and added the noise layer.
  11. That function seems to assume that our screens are insanely bright, and it has to dim things to match prints. But of course we know better - our screens are already dim enough to match prints.
  12. It's fair to say that at the time LR was first developed, there were VERY few screens showing greater than sRGB on the market.
×
×
  • Create New...