Jump to content

Damien Symonds

Administrator
  • Posts

    209,835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3,378

Everything posted by Damien Symonds

  1. The only complicating factor is the little bit of missing wing on the right side of the big girl. I had to borrow some other bits of wing to recreate the missing areas here:
  2. That's right. Open the first image and extend the canvas size to the left. Add more than you think you'll need. Then File>Place the second image. Then lower its opacity and fiddle with it until it lines up as best you can. Then mask.
  3. Have you read through the Layers & Masks Class yet?
  4. Great. So in that case, I think your best chance is to use the left side of the second photo (including the bigger girl) and the right side of the first photo (including the smaller girl) and have the blend between them.
  5. Photoshop CC has an auto save feature, which might have helped, but I'm not optimistic. Some discussion about it here.
  6. You explained it perfectly. I understand exactly what you want. Please answer my question. Do you mind which version of the older girl we use?
  7. I can see why you prefer the little girl in the first photo. But is there a reason you prefer the big girl in the first photo? She looks nice in both to me.
  8. Your file is perfect. This is a cock-up at their end.
  9. I think she'll be very pleased with that. Well done.
  10. http://www.damiensymonds.net/2013/09/grabbing-700x700px-100-crop.html
  11. Great question. Maybe this?
  12. You need to make the edges a bit better.
  13. What makes you think those Pinterest ones weren't actually drawn with chalk, and photographed?
  14. Maybe this? http://www.damiensymonds.net/2015/08/fixing-tan-lines.html
  15. Sorry, I mean, restart your computer then open PSE again, and take a screenshot to show me the problem.
  16. It was never broken, I promise. That's how it has always been. It only shows when a photo is open.
  17. Partially reducing opacity of all the text would be the first step.
  18. I'm so sorry, there's still no better method than the one I first described. You'd need to work patiently on a dodge and burn layer to get rid of the rest
  19. I think this is perfectly feasible, it will just take a LOT of patience. A lot of borrowing tiny parts of the three to form a 2, lots of tiny cloning. I made a bit of a start:
  20. Oh, what a great challenge! I'm up for it. I figure you'd want the 2 to look like the one in this set?
×
×
  • Create New...